Ok, I can make a patch for option 3 (the same as js-mode) instead. It's implementation is the simplest also. Would that work? Thanks On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 4:15 PM Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 24/04/2024 05:36, Noah Peart wrote: > > > What js-mode does (looks like 3) shouldn't be too bad, but I wouldn't > > mind an extra indentation level for such cases, too (example 2). > > > > The problem I found with option 2/3 was cases like the following (which > > also seem like the most common) where I expect the start of > > the function be indented according to `typescript-ts-mode-indent-offset`, > > not with the declaration keyword "const" as in `js-mode` (and option 3). > > > > const someFuncWithReallyLongName = > > async (x: number, y: number, z: number): Promise => { > > // ... > > }; > > I don't know, in my understanding the line break after the "=" (or its > absence) is usually a good enough look to choose between indentation > offsets for a given statement. I.e. with the break after = it would be > indented deeply, and without it (keeping "async" on the first line) the > body would have the same base indentation as the "const" statement. > > Though of course some users like it differently anyway. >