On 31 May 2013 07:20, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Stefan Monnier > > Adapting to this change is very simple. > > > > We should advertise it (I presume you mean the use > > of --enable-locallisppath=PATH) at least as loudly as the "default > > $prefix is probably not good for you". > > Just a reminder that --enable-locallisppath=PATH seems not to work (I mentioned that in my original post). Also I'm not sure how you would use it to add "ROOT/../site-lisp", which is what you would need for backward compatibility. > > I'd prefer to poll users whether they use that ../site-lisp directory, > before adding this to the instructions. I suspect very few do, which > would mean we make the instructions more complex than they already > are. > > FWIW I asked my two Emacs-using co-workers. One uses ROOT\..\site-lisp (but doesn't have strong feelings either way), the other has no user- or site- lisp files at all.