From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Copley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24500: 25.1.50; Can't other-window from minibuffer if Ediff control panel frame present Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 19:28:31 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83a8f1f8l0.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvj0dkhd.fsf@gnu.org> <57E6CE51.1040600@gmx.at> <57F92EE8.3030203@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475951427 1149 195.159.176.226 (8 Oct 2016 18:30:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 18:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 24500@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 08 20:30:23 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bswO4-0007r2-Vd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 20:30:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42025 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bswO1-000352-PK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 14:30:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33602) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bswNu-000320-3e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 14:30:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bswNo-0000BZ-BT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 14:30:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42774) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bswNo-0000BK-8k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 14:30:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bswNo-0001XJ-4N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 14:30:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Richard Copley Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 18:30:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24500 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24500-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24500.14759513505784 (code B ref 24500); Sat, 08 Oct 2016 18:30:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24500) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2016 18:29:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48961 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bswMw-0001VE-9v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 14:29:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vk0-f54.google.com ([209.85.213.54]:35626) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bswMu-0001V0-7c for 24500@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 14:29:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-vk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 192so67448047vkl.2 for <24500@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 11:29:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=utXpLIKnZgnUhLhmRtB2G7fvg9ZD5YomMXmRdtZVYLw=; b=XjFBWBzkp/UWi8rF03h9y/M0lCFbAyHfqZMnbIGrDnbynqeMS2MACk5WICnKTs+nRg vMZYizHqn/4cdyQt8YV8Efy6QnKS26rQty5JXR8RVqdW4MT1bMHvSZ8iFwYbzgUZPLPY Gm/aTGgoy8qAiOIGDLnXOt4/JA/SGn5oonXj1b5QDO164kZB9464RvnI2rihIfaJ3Fd3 8IU43N5fNnh6IvB25fAmPQl9SHKRgPt8AFva0Yq+afl8Kqxr5jLKJvHiSL5L+kUR4JRu oIkF/dnqSf1WrUGhnPqwemrlsy1IiPYdjCc1/bo2mUR8DlK3e3sRz0HB6clUBDZTP/SP tWww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=utXpLIKnZgnUhLhmRtB2G7fvg9ZD5YomMXmRdtZVYLw=; b=lIAw0cZE8hNYOK5tKt0iEmX0PEFkSodxftG+Yz4nsHgfMn0Pa1Ur8pz/zM+HgAr1YU joZoB4Mq4NCJVxa9iTfV7pu06zkUrsq6VkOatqQkq9FwX9P9w2xhDBF9iF/itJuI5K77 swvlJ+RlzINGGxB+1SESNqrSUyeQPxLmzn+r9qps1pzc/J7I+b7DTT+q4AK1FqB+jkAE WGgp+KgSqwDBMYfl7uUFVBdvNGQiG2h+p0ZpzXQe6ttcIyWbX+8kjYHYx0PiXDqLwyEQ XlBaqsoYxeGlXlGxZBg0NaXhTWDs6tEquepsA2ipmbOLJVGhTj7WSdSWycBJghDmr9Cj UhFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RmHwDyn3Xt6P6YJFUxfYMy9bxHNTqYT9p2e+Nl3uPdug7xI2qT6knO1iLEaVsLuRU0A/22xeBCTpG6uMQ== X-Received: by 10.31.174.134 with SMTP id x128mr19048431vke.73.1475951342767; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 11:29:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.159.40.1 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Oct 2016 11:28:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57F92EE8.3030203@gmx.at> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:124235 Archived-At: On 8 October 2016 at 18:37, martin rudalics wrote: >> I've been using the window.c patch for a few days and I haven't noticed >> any badness. > > I see the following problem with emacs -Q: > > Evaluate > > (make-frame '((minibuffer . nil))) > > In the minibuffer-less frame do M-x > > In the minibuffer type C-x 5 o > > In the minibuffer-less frame type C-x 5 o > > Now back in the minibuffer typing C-x o does nothing. You can only get > out via C-x 5 o. Confirmed, sorry I missed that. > The situation improves on the unpatched one because there is a way out > of this loop and in particular one your typed before. Still this is > only a 50% solution. When we do C-x o and we do not redirect focus as > in the frame.c patch, frame focus sticks on the minibuffer. We should > tell Windows to direct focus back to the minibuffer-less frame. I'll > check this on GNU/Linux tomorrow. In any case, consider reconsidering. I'm not sure what you mean. Reconsider what? Do you want me to test with both patches at once? > martin