From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Justin Schell Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45701: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] (33b8ce8) `M-x report-emacs-bug` error: "Wrong type argument: stringp, nil" Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 13:51:03 -0800 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30576"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 45701@debbugs.gnu.org, contact@jimeh.me To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 01 22:52:17 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l6h7I-0007pU-FT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 22:52:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51384 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6h7H-0002u4-GV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 16:52:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46990) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6h74-0002to-Jh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 16:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50127) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6h74-00070a-CG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 16:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6h74-0004FG-AP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 16:52:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Justin Schell Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 21:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45701 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: "Andrea Corallo via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" , 45701@debbugs.gnu.org, Jim Myhrberg Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.161221630016292 (code B ref -1); Mon, 01 Feb 2021 21:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2021 21:51:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33440 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6h6h-0004Eg-Sq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 16:51:40 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:45280) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6h6f-0004EP-6D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 16:51:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46926) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6h6e-0002mE-Kl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 16:51:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]:44654) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6h6c-0006pv-K7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 16:51:36 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id f2so21534512ljp.11 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 13:51:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AyvdIeVEBSQN0aYnZ9cknjBy6mSsiRjsLE7q4KEPkgY=; b=tpfOQanTrQzhgqbsw0Edeh6/itSGS3RggD9DOlvlLfELDoNxaSaMPG3JqIElR7oJjX FQ5ue4wRtRAR2Cd8xinEpQNxXNW9V57S8UBdGm2yP+FzGcnPCGqU5PxgL/dOiR5s1rXo 3yFbR+f5YDDeRU+F6gnhWyW66zD4uN5FVJhWEP837kfQp/TLYj6GTjjxvA8mVtG/7szY 5DtKt1WQaRv56J+5CsO2z2fCFDcZdk/f8nVIKapCp+vuwAVRLEwrUSz6bNSU45+Bzc6O XY1b7fvEkU2QQEy2VctsA8H3KRW24aHLMWTr0C42VdOIRiomykC+bf180BQRU8NyHVVi T4/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AyvdIeVEBSQN0aYnZ9cknjBy6mSsiRjsLE7q4KEPkgY=; b=meLG7uQXbcwQA/UDeV5pfKyNo0AEVsioKmc8U8skGJ/qBlmohlb282GTXgcQ17onL8 +abXkpGdunumh0FyH5TkbZrdUJSAM7WXW2WG50Xr7Q1MxUgrMvobXlM1qT9WZbLrqJJb iaWkISfdED0dNtfkaTVMo9HT0tyObX3GiGWqcqQvvXo0dhxFnyXkudNm3HgD58JydiMB 9nyIDZlq6AL2ajh641WQici60AqnKNPZ1UbNXEOEvckl7M2K+8aq+mRevlahDSUz6Ca/ qGaCySMnP8vRN+ffJnbt/lYlykpgG3DaEanLLkyg4qjA4BFLF2qhhMlQL0pabwCmmpB8 GMLg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532O44rKC9jIthuLcotp/gupPeh7S/wrjvq2a8HTYJCZaIePYdBL 5OAszkNsIFo7JSfQaFUTwx6N9vWnIIq7Uk3RNpk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyoi3Uujpg1W/PGK4nybKC+GrCeOqUGHGUmwi77F9L8ZKwcVqjAWtrkLhjUBAVl3YlOENr58aJwRJSeSsbFJAU= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:980a:: with SMTP id a10mr11374562ljj.280.1612216289048; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 13:51:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::22d; envelope-from=justinmschell@gmail.com; helo=mail-lj1-x22d.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:199115 Archived-At: > Is this issue still present? Was it investigated as suggested? Yes, I just built from the latest `feature/native-comp` commit (`a8b8d22`) and the issue is still present. Re: investigation, I was under the impression from your last comment (below) that you needed to do something to "produce a batch reproducer". Or did I misunderstand and that's something that I can do? If so, is there a guide or instructions as I'm not familiar with how to do that. > > I guess the next step for me would be to produce a batch reproducer and > > then run it under gdb with a break point in 'wrong_type_argument' to see > > where this is going wrong. It's also bizarre that the Lisp debugger is > > not triggered by `toggle-debug-on-error'. Justin