From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pip Cet Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46502: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] (d3a399dd) native-comp bootstrap failure Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 17:02:23 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87o8gn8ciy.fsf@md5i.com> <83h7m95tt2.fsf@gnu.org> <83ft1s2mp1.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6rz15jm.fsf@gnu.org> <831rdb0yt9.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7111"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mwd@md5i.com, 46502@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 20 18:07:28 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lDVj5-0001kJ-AM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:07:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34888 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDVj4-0007ot-AP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:07:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55602) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDVfm-0005kF-HS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:04:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41182) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDVfm-0007Wo-9B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:04:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDVfm-0006d0-4C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:04:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Pip Cet Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 17:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46502 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46502-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46502.161384058925401 (code B ref 46502); Sat, 20 Feb 2021 17:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46502) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2021 17:03:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52728 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDVev-0006bd-16 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:03:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-oi1-f179.google.com ([209.85.167.179]:44267) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDVes-0006b7-B7 for 46502@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:03:07 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-oi1-f179.google.com with SMTP id r75so9503325oie.11 for <46502@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 09:03:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RRe3P9tdDqooabjAB2I498tNsZmhe2xHI/JSv8CqnUM=; b=qC+P8fKeP/xxyJgpFbWAxjsfwTz1ssd60ebZyR7MSNloPbhNBtplJvXTRM5hwViRk4 6fHf3FUfJsx9f9rxqevGtNiYEHUlM7fS6nRD3CSVUnjCkapbWkP34q3BDFD8i6eFNLwJ K48DlrnOt+H3npw8rCUqbM5+VkBJB/OgSOgYjIsENSj4vko68k+31LpIU4qsK9ZIUvF6 8MHL1yacYyeB4PvK7Sfrsg3LSToQr67TgpEmoNQIGA20DR35IEWDI3oMj+ycV4AjvuGY CCnvpZBWJkmhrC8phIFljDCGTZk2neYAdnD/nxJClToKREUGmXMnyC/gdNr26WrTGoGT Rz/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RRe3P9tdDqooabjAB2I498tNsZmhe2xHI/JSv8CqnUM=; b=nD8AtRznQi8XPX9Zv0s5T5SB6sljVsvPfTGpOZgGAtyzZiaWzQpyl6Nt8QsuKnBJy0 1c3XGfndfVRwwbKqId6U0R7UQCNdqvIHutaLgtyRPkU9BkTzTK7550PSqM4OAED4Z91u 45XmuayiISrtdBwEM095suMQ8oKc+zspx+ACHBpeqjbYCCFNHbdMph8LovsGePZKyDKZ tj6F/sUKYbRvrXTDTbrC7uucoo1EWZDehFmjihcBLuTtCP+UGrnZtm96Nd/ogx2LD9B+ k8JYdEgqbDIQ4MZ5HalXmaTJ4eaKb0Ts+4bW/QU5WvHL+a0bV/IHlFVJAL9mchAmL3NL UtHA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531T/eJA+c8fSqKa9P/H8AhJTdCjSroQBLYdWvvxRSuDQuvAD49V 7TFJb7mW/GZGOnWntB8HSrCotmncNapZkc8FlLU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwZ0yHiw4mDPLc/BlM5bR4x7OxVqy0E+hfd4ufWyYL8raUpI5TmASzv/gVhZER9Lv3YokDhQf05EMM7BDEqgXA= X-Received: by 2002:aca:4c5:: with SMTP id 188mr6282463oie.44.1613840580895; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 09:03:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200447 Archived-At: On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 3:42 PM Stefan Monnier wrote: > One of the possibility is always the inlining (where we either inline > the source code or the bytecode depending on whether the function to be > inlined has already been byte-compiled). That's what it looks like. Are we supposed to fold constants in both cases? > Can you try the patch below to see if it makes a difference? It does, no difference with the patch.