From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pip Cet Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46256: [feature/native-comp] AOT eln files ignored if run from build tree Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 13:52:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: <86eehujcip.fsf@gmail.com> <86blch14qt.fsf@gmail.com> <83h7m84h9g.fsf@gnu.org> <86v9ao5czu.fsf@gmail.com> <86wnutogrh.fsf@gmail.com> <86wnut8fb9.fsf@gmail.com> <861rd1tbpa.fsf@gmail.com> <83pn0km6y3.fsf@gnu.org> <86ft1f8ara.fsf@gmail.com> <83sg5cjdn8.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1kwjcy2.fsf@gnu.org> <8335x6u9o4.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgzesrku.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1kpsrng.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23694"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46256@debbugs.gnu.org, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, Andrea Corallo To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 08 15:32:39 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lJGw3-00063d-7i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 15:32:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37260 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJGw2-0003gJ-98 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:32:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54092) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJGKg-0002MV-ED for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 08:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59097) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJGKg-0002KN-51 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 08:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJGKg-0002Gd-3f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 08:54:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Pip Cet Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 13:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46256 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46256-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46256.16152116138680 (code B ref 46256); Mon, 08 Mar 2021 13:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46256) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2021 13:53:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42410 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJGKC-0002Fw-PD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 08:53:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ot1-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:34607) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJGKB-0002Fh-7X for 46256@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 08:53:31 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ot1-f46.google.com with SMTP id n23so3586840otq.1 for <46256@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 05:53:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Mu2Vfc3uBseULLEEM3LQ7RrvF5YUxATkR44sftX4EPs=; b=UaYQrX6fYrOUP961tWjj6X/9NxMXAJl7RAgZHlnnhd/entAA9ra7rOG91p7FkGZ1nw MyBKRTDspBD0wjjrR3bBZmfxiBQ9ygjRCnbVfoL62CeXS/oCIaZ/C9FsO2oGMhRjbhta jUV6wqeiNRrT9krSwQJkKniegF+kA7L7yh6Ah51kmVZPzOR+iVBvxqTYQJJ87aabQKsb p7aSmBtxFjgDCY6CDC0gXyqwZsqeLKbhoaqN39zXUaE6son0HcT0qJWlHg13rjU7Z35M Vufq0TOFziQaZgLgoNJNzZGK/KcKqBHUIIdQC/d9OMjypns7HH5deFr3wxSmAQyzrVYx WIlw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Mu2Vfc3uBseULLEEM3LQ7RrvF5YUxATkR44sftX4EPs=; b=YjonZo1YhWU708oGW1+cdC/Cf1qDPXm4OiCb7gAXeEApuZWvqc80JtHqeaaYb6DHOk aEdE/lflQ4HF9P66Z4mgLl3rm14DDY2JMXB0jsveQbDZQrupdbTdSZwD5f1A1Xh6RMo5 55d9RVl0KGgu38Q5Vp1XvQ0/b6nWXxBZHtC9++XCKCMFuNWsWQvchp0CKVQ3+t6TGt5N WrQ0RbIUzrgg85rBnDSSHAkGuZgLkb0HEW2aKTSMktsRjK2bagqJE1EXeULKVrNY3iZe M7GR+cyxQnJNdtnqddx33b7pE/SELFf6hXn4XpKtLxWbrNbFIAW6dYzG2x8vjdAdoJox 8HXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5300hDdEP/5fZegOesGgeaB88yQB3le6U11uOGgQJSVXAwPVstzJ HZgpS1NGCJnsMoa6Y/MzYouIdZke/5nu1eFD4tY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyL/PVnzQHTIhMjmoDQBophJtLPysfUa9oRglB8DQNlnGIKU/ajoFgqMYXl02zXVZuWM2uYfgpXRsKdPsVDDHQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1011:: with SMTP id a17mr17646308otp.154.1615211605435; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 05:53:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83r1kpsrng.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201834 Archived-At: On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 1:26 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Pip Cet > > Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2021 22:16:58 +0000 > > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 46256@debbugs.gnu.org, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com > > > If the CU was GC'ed the eln should have been dlclosed. > > > > Wait, I thought this was on Windows? > > Yes, and...? No dlclose() on Windows. FreeLibrary() is documented to behave differently from dlclose(), and I don't have a Windows system to test whether it's actually different in practice. > > > If that's the > > > case at the next load we should get a fresh handle > > > > You're assuming > > 1. FreeLibrary() succeeded > > 2. The module's refcount was 1 > > 3. The module wasn't pinned. > > > > If any of these assumptions is violated, the behavior would be > > precisely as observed. > > Why would any of the above assumptions be violated? I have several suspicions, including "because the second compilation unit referring to the same handle hasn't been collected". Because that is definitely a bug, and one we should fix, and then we can debug this issue more if and when it reappears. Pip