From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pip Cet Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46502: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] (d3a399dd) native-comp bootstrap failure Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:03:42 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87o8gn8ciy.fsf@md5i.com> <83h7m95tt2.fsf@gnu.org> <83ft1s2mp1.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6rz15jm.fsf@gnu.org> <831rdb0yt9.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgzzyn72.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12334"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mwd@md5i.com, Stefan Monnier , 46502@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 20 13:05:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lDR0Z-00034I-Gh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 13:05:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53952 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDR0Y-0006bk-H7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 07:05:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53690) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDR0Q-0006Zz-4t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 07:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39612) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDR0P-0006FW-Sz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 07:05:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDR0P-0003Py-MS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 07:05:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Pip Cet Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46502 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46502-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46502.161382266713086 (code B ref 46502); Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46502) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2021 12:04:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51158 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDQzr-0003P0-AM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 07:04:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ot1-f43.google.com ([209.85.210.43]:41847) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDQzp-0003Oj-Js for 46502@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 07:04:26 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ot1-f43.google.com with SMTP id s107so7635499otb.8 for <46502@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 04:04:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ALGeQeNJgteu7X6X0cBe0QF2zWsLm2Cj/HvFsgh5Gx4=; b=N1l3G2hslXWkGdK0OE9uoEO+pISy/vNNvy41kqPRFsR5OP9xa6CZTM429t1T8EferD x2E4O1ZxIEygk5VH4RabX8dbHcJuRrt652Fux6pRSCZXj4U6m9UX7CoYPOEGuCkzPZcR UxTsJ9Cw1v9K9w3awz7J0f0cV3DC/PqRjp+7E/sM4xUmf10nAKjQfzi3D4e+jRMd8x6i vzJfNbF6GwNK5vigENE3/xLUNvR3pg9ZP0B1+UYNRCLs+0kllU/B84wtCUtmVdWUDUqR FMHgQJGlxjTFbmOGYkPf5CXmnwNfJEmXNYUg3RL9Po63ps34WRKc/fBSLKWFlNhUTSmU XWdA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ALGeQeNJgteu7X6X0cBe0QF2zWsLm2Cj/HvFsgh5Gx4=; b=O2LlxQNc2a9ACJywtCn+dgL9+yXS7HvOt+8sW9SJ9bArnQVKu7bTNNZCg1ZgDocX+5 H1eXFVrjg3w4m78l3zeGW3SGzwEFjlDoQVdFDSqQBxWupcuGVx8RDl6AdZwRKzjelrub F1bqqD+CSm2oYRRFbacZFlkf3Ivi3xW1l22IiYCdthRjCi+vzKlxjs+JIcJU/yl+asIG YvqF6a5QgXikVgjOVGk5SosTwKJEI166cuFz7srL2R71IOWRD2pjee3k5b55oFuoZQwS h/Tj1el1lRQmsLfizF4YgX/ZM4gUb4eMme3SD+TFqYV2/tUnG0nS0nMadAN6zNvEgxyr twag== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5328rIfqupzC7mXAYQr3DXBWxU/4sq4D1fkZGq2Nmwt1xRcojVBk P5qrvfcWOIHeZcI27743KK0wT2E3cpngSVa5zCM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwtC04qSDrHF2owO4c+vumm4c4I4umbURnJe63CeA+khlAlX3qHhvWCBGCbMNaFuFuV8zqekBd9Z8AdAOpJCuw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1682:: with SMTP id k2mr10315288otr.154.1613822659830; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 04:04:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83zgzzyn72.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200418 Archived-At: On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 11:48 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 13:21:38 +0200 > > From: Eli Zaretskii > > Cc: mwd@md5i.com, 46502@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org > > > > > From: Pip Cet > > > Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 09:15:48 +0000 > > > Cc: akrl@sdf.org, mwd@md5i.com, 46502@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > > > > Can you send the diffs as an attachment? > > > > > > I'm sending the complete diff, even though it's a bit large... The > > > path differences are obviously okay, and I'm not going to complain > > > about differences in gensym numbering, but byte-optimize-lapcode, to > > > pick an example at random, differs in the bytecode. > > > > Thanks. Stefan, any idea why we see differences here? > > Btw, if you let macroexp.el byte-compile uninterrupted, then rename > the .elc file and re-compile the .el file, do you get identical .elc > files? So what I did is this: 1. make 2. wait for bootstrap.pdmp to be built 3. wait for macroexp.elc and the other files in compile-first to be generated 4. interrupt 5. rename byte-opt.elc to byte-opt.elc.1 6. make 7. wait for byte-opt.elc to be rebuilt 8. diff I saw differences as before. Did you want me to rename "macroexp.elc" in step 5?