From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pip Cet Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46974: 28.0.50; [nativecomp] wrong-type-argument number-or-marker-p with native compiled code only Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2021 20:43:11 +0000 Message-ID: References: <6043d628.1c69fb81.dc872.e8e3@mx.google.com> <60444772.1c69fb81.64275.1ddd@mx.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26450"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Erik Hetzner , 46974-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 07 21:44:54 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lJ0Gk-0006lp-Ix for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 21:44:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36146 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJ0Gj-0004Ln-LY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 15:44:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJ0Fu-0003y0-7b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 15:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58296) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJ0Ft-0003BU-VR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 15:44:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJ0Ft-0008JL-SK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 15:44:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Pip Cet Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2021 20:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46974 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46974-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D46974.161514983831930 (code D ref 46974); Sun, 07 Mar 2021 20:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46974-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2021 20:43:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41609 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJ0Fp-0008Iw-Ut for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 15:43:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-oo1-f45.google.com ([209.85.161.45]:36382) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJ0Fk-0008If-Ti for 46974-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 15:43:56 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-oo1-f45.google.com with SMTP id x10so1749457oor.3 for <46974-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 12:43:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MceYpD6e0d43ZarNR8JosFJJvabgDpjQT97T1jWsBRs=; b=ksczHMLN0vLdEGOkLKk9bvenepM/ykGUb4O0a2gueimxjyLV+aks9wADxVS3P3XM98 Vhaqfabz+0tmNon+uamL+ycdO9LVQF5J61Sd87fqEJXX49LaSgw6ixOcO+G02mIVlcjw 1yoSAq2dw3h1BqLdVgIJ6+NPYXSezR7AHCenbwpAkp277lytL999f4vzJlF9E2O5608q GnskMcv80/rpDNQbSAq5jeCL7yR7k3uUPUdpx0obne+tGv9zaqfOMLMkclSc54R0aBoO VP8vwEwcFWJMZg2u13VUDgmUC93JaCCuhLj2KzvCdYZ/iTRRcHjwaGVvE3rSlMxBrVVw cJpQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MceYpD6e0d43ZarNR8JosFJJvabgDpjQT97T1jWsBRs=; b=F2RtS1aEVfnJW+heymDyhDnpf4jotDHd/2b9yByAUJsZwtbYs17M+VB6TfupPSBfiw +ZwgS4dozJ7Bj8gX7FXAQcBQw6HjBAjedio6oV41JW7FGERqi+/eHxckO7tZ2bXS0NvL WSIVye3rn7amV18GtMG5Ca9Mie5b6TCcRGe0FiMRzsMpA0crN/9bAq2kxO2bXLpCFRkq 0vdx4mJARAUMqYQZ7cCHMR+R7H8fsKggeVe8o5JdtFD53lpFkADy0kx/MxkOy/VSK+Ps 5aJCfOcXowJ7mQTyiCZNaKy/mpV6J2wWF2hJ2+Uk4Wh38STRGm/MaxRqCrh2Vtyu9E96 ElqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531WAoeqIvKyleKeycwXszZoNhdKmvUHuyct9KanZlYyyARoN3xL PsXIxwHEuIBi9XChy/FHjMvNjZcIOzIdteVfCTo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzpvUCpynHPvYsO1J4u21rMFS8kL4Vg/6RPsTOKJUZAFMBX0zqqtAujI/wsTnR4ZhCeFlvGeF5gyDnoqw3IlV4= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:2a0a:: with SMTP id k10mr16268486oof.88.1615149827287; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 12:43:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201781 Archived-At: On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 8:33 PM Andrea Corallo wrote: > Pip Cet writes: > > Perfectly open question: how would you feel about adding LAP > > reproducers for cases like this one, where it's hard to get at the > > Lisp source? I think I've got the reproducer LAP code here, and it > > shouldn't be too hard to write comp--native-compile-lap, but if you'd > > prefer not to go that way I'm perfectly okay with it, too. > > I'm open to the idea of having a new way to stress the code in the > testsuite, I'm a little doubtful this worth of, well certainly for this > specific case where the patch is clearly correct. > > What's your feeling about this? I think this is going to be something we want eventually, but it's harder than I thought, so I won't pursue this for now. Pip