From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reuben Thomas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13566: Commit made Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:05:26 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87vcai5xp0.fsf@sc3d.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160c36e896c9c04e90396bc X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1382101570 29434 80.91.229.3 (18 Oct 2013 13:06:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13566@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 18 15:06:14 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VX9ks-000666-J5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:06:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57641 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VX9ks-0003yL-58 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:06:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57066) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VX9kl-0003xx-9G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:06:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VX9kg-0002Os-Us for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:06:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42630) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VX9kg-0002Om-Or for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VX9kg-0004Dm-08 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Reuben Thomas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13566 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13566-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13566.138210153716188 (code B ref 13566); Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13566) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Oct 2013 13:05:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56649 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VX9kG-0004D1-4O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:05:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-la0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:65315) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VX9kC-0004Cg-R9 for 13566@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:05:34 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id eh20so665893lab.19 for <13566@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 06:05:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sc3d.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=bE3kGCwSQQaRFfnl6PMjp/LzfFCbR0sHiTqEjpOBtvw=; b=vo8XYEVPyPm50xcR+KxQ728f9Rz9S9k3lk7F+HCNVDYESHizZ721zvTTOj+K+6QvDM J7+OIllK8f9ObgPuWjEOEhY2nu04Vhhwp/LwhLP8nKYwhkNhjh+eUJGwJmY8Gx3RQo0R 4bJ53j7voum1ACD1DL8gJAvSkL89GngUTfvcM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bE3kGCwSQQaRFfnl6PMjp/LzfFCbR0sHiTqEjpOBtvw=; b=ICwOEjzDskxvPrWVAwXA1IwZxrhjFY91ualF1/qHtoxpvrmUBT0rODNxdqYVGrdIVJ iW1UtcQRY6HcFQbviE8iXeqbGd8LS8sD0oDmtzk9tGZCbesPWw8tXnGl2vhdDZs2sGdF GGkbSXnViw03yvn/25SGNivdArKlyXrUpBCsnuN3pDoLPhJCBWsE+RY6a34ou6rf1H8m YkzrtOVDa0fJ8bq8kUo8Kj4SHuoR3Ndxn4XwDRkeQmgRGbcStF0xviZvyLXRHsxxeWFt llMHmvU3iz6s6G3SSi2kINM7e0cN/l5T8OtMP4AL4RgZsFPf8mCY286xHaAMdSCiBdRw X5/w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkkHH3+mJbtTl9Qru99R/11Esv7CG5uwPAFlBfU367mVqoURiJ9+2zBFfKzr9TxW7WHAHsS X-Received: by 10.152.26.72 with SMTP id j8mr2428943lag.19.1382101526600; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 06:05:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.152.228.135 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 06:05:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:79361 Archived-At: --089e0160c36e896c9c04e90396bc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 18 October 2013 13:59, Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> > I'm not sure what happened, but my commit did not seem to stick. > >> What makes you think so? > > It did not appear on Savannah. > >> What command have you executed, what results did you get? > >> You know, the usual bug-report routine, > > I did not attempt to report a bug, since instead I redid the process. > > I'm sure I did something wrong, and there was no bug. > > Many bug-reports are like that. The same info is needed to help you > find the part that was wrong. > Since I didn't realise something had gone wrong until some months later, it seemed more profitable simply to redo than to attempt to reconstruct what I did wrong on this occasion; but I take your point. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org --089e0160c36e896c9c04e90396bc Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 18 October 2013 13:59, Stefan Monnier <monnier@= iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>> > I'm not = sure what happened, but my commit did not seem to stick.
>> What makes you think so?
> It did not appear on Savannah.
>> What command have you executed, what results did you get?
>> You know, the usual bug-report routine,
> I did not attempt to report a bug, since instead I redid the process.<= br> > I'm sure I did something wrong, and there was no bug.

Many bug-reports are like that. =A0The same info is needed to help yo= u
find the part that was wrong.

Since I d= idn't realise something had gone wrong until some months later, it seem= ed more profitable simply to redo than to attempt to reconstruct what I did= wrong on this occasion; but I take your point.

--
http://rr= t.sc3d.org
--089e0160c36e896c9c04e90396bc--