2018-01-30 18:53 GMT+00:00 Basil L. Contovounesios <contovob@tcd.ie>:

>
> I am taking the liberty of CCing Reuben because I believe this report
> can be merged with bug#30213.  As justification, a recap and correction
> of my diagnosis and solution from that report follows.
>
> The async-shell-command-display-buffer toggle determines whether the
> output buffer is displayed immediately or in the process filter, as the
> latter should only be executed on process output.  The guard in the
> process filter, however, has always required that the buffer (a) be
> empty; and (b) have the same name as the original output buffer.
>

​I think you're right that (b) is not necessary. I think I did it that way
originally because I was doing everything with the buffer name, so really
it was just an oversight.​

-- 
https://rrt.sc3d.org