On 14 May 2013 15:57, Sebastien Vauban wrote: > I just wanted to direct you toward a better and more recent implementation. > But, sure, if you use the other one, and it's buggy, it should be fixed, as > long it's still around, in the official code base. > You're quite right, and indeed I did try capture some time ago, couldn't immediately make it do what I wanted, and left a FIXME in my Emacs setup to return to the problem at some later date. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org