>
> By "input system", do you mean a separate language-environment with a
> separate input method?  That would be OK, I think


I meant to say, "input method".
Is there a need for a separate language-environment?
I think only writing a new input-method  will be sufficient, right?

On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 9:27 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30@gmail.com>
> > Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 21:08:09 +0530
> > Cc: Visuwesh <visuweshm@gmail.com>, 55493@debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> >  The changes to HELLO do more that the above says.  I don't think I
> >  understand the reason for the change in the "South Asia" line.
> >
> > The South Asia line was correcting the Odia greeting, which I had
> changed previously (from "Listen" to
> > "Namaskaar")
>
> Please reflect that in the log message.
>
> >  This is unrelated, and I see no reason to rename the variable in a
> >  backward-incompatible way.  It's just a variable, so it doesn't have
> >  to be named rigorously correct.  If we were discussing new code, the
> >  correction would have had its place, but not now, 16 years after it
> >  was introduced.
> >
> > This variable name is somewhat misleading. When I searched "iso 638",
> online to see whether the language
> > codes were updated or not,
> >  it showed me results for oven boards, later when searching "iso 638
> languages" I realized that the correct
> > standard number is 639.
> > There was also a FIXME above it, so I fixed that.
> > If there is a backward-compatible way to change it please tell me, or if
> you still feel the change is not
> > warranted, I will revert this it.
>
> A backward-compatible change would need to introduce an obsolete alias
> with the old name.
>
> >  I don't think we should rename variables and functions.  It's just a
> >  lot of hassle for us (defalias etc.) and potentially for others, and
> >  the gain is very small.  This variable doesn't even say "oriya", just
> >  "ori".  Let's not be too radical here.
> >
> > Then I should only rename in etc/HELLO, and in (set-language-info-alist)
> of lisp/language/indian.el.
>
> Yes, I think so.
>
> >  We cannot rename an input method we had for almost 20 years.  If there
> >  is some way of having an alias for an input method (I don't think so,
> >  but maybe I'm missing something), let's use that; otherwise we will
> >  have either to leave the old name alone or define a new input method
> >  that is an exact copy of the old one, except for the name and the
> >  mode-line indicator.
> >
> > How about I make a new Odia input system, just like the ones which I had
> made for the other scripts, and
> > leave the old ones alone?
>
> By "input system", do you mean a separate language-environment with a
> separate input method?  That would be OK, I think.
>
> Thanks.
>