Ok I will do that, thanks!On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 10:55 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:> From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 22:40:02 +0530
> Cc: 55370@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> Yes it was not correct, this seems more appropriate.
>
> ;; Syloti Nagri composition rules
> (let ((consonant "[\xA807-\xA80A\xA80C-\xA822]")
> (independent-vowel "[\xA800\xA801\xA803-\xA805]")
> (vowel "[\xA802\xA823-\xA827]")
> (nasal "[\xA80B]")
> (virama "[\xA806\xA82C]"))
> (set-char-table-range composition-function-table
> '(#xA802 . #xA82C)
> (list (vector
> ;; Consonant conjunct based syllables
> (concat independent-vowel "?" consonant "\\(?:" virama consonant "\\)+"
> vowel "?" nasal "?")
> 1 'font-shape-gstring))))
>
> btw this range does not cause emacs to slow down, right?
It might, because the range is very large, and so any character in the
range #xA802..#xA82C will cause Emacs to try to match the regexp.
So if there's a way of having the rules on fewer characters, that
would be better, even if there will be more rules.
> also should I send separate patches for the syloti nagri, and the fix for previous scripts, or combine them into
> one?
You can combine them into a single patch, just make sure the log
message mentions all the changes.
Thanks.