ispell-filter is empty. Here's the partial output (I used ispell-print-if-debug to get the messages in the same buffer): ..... ispell-region: string pos (22->28), eol: 28, [in-comment]: [%], [add-comment]: [%], [string]: [^%fred}} ] DEBUG-ISPELL-FILTER: () ispell-region: string pos (28->28), eol: 37, [in-comment]: [nil], [add-comment]: [nil], [string]: [nil] ispell-region: string pos (29->37), eol: 37, [in-comment]: [nil], [add-comment]: [nil], [string]: [^envolope ] DEBUG-ISPELL-FILTER: () I notice that it is sending two queries (one of which is nil) before it attempts to read the output. Perhaps this is the problem? Somebody else sent me a mail saying this isn't a problem in the latest emacs. I'm happy to continue trying to debug if you think it's useful otherwise should I just upgrade and stop here? On 17 February 2017 at 16:37, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Bob Alice > > Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:21:11 +0000 > > Cc: 25766@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Note: I removed \autoref{alice}. It wasn't necessary. New file is: > > > > \caption{5\% \label{_fred}} > > envolope > > > > Debugger gives: > > ispell-region: string pos (29->37), eol: 37, [in-comment]: [nil], > [add-comment]: [nil], [string]: [^envolope > > > > Running: > > /usr/bin/aspell -a -m -d en --encoding=utf-8 > > > > Inputting: > > ^envolope > > > > Output: > > & envolope 7 1: envelope, enveloper, envelop, enveloped, envelopes, > envelops, envelope's > > > > This output looks sensible, but the spelling options do not appear in > the emacs buffer. > > Strange. I guess the next step is to look at what Emacs receives from > aspell. I think if you display the value of ispell-filter in > ispell-process-line, it will show that. Here's the relevant part of > ispell-process-line: > > ;; send string to spell process and get input. > (ispell-send-string string) > (while (progn > (ispell-accept-output) > ;; Last item of output contains a blank line. <<<<<<<<<<<< > (not (string= "" (car ispell-filter))))) > > Insert > > (message "%s" ispell-filter) > > before the marked line, then load ispell.el manually, and repeat the > experiment. The results should be in the *Messages* buffer. Maybe if > we see what Emacs gets back from aspell, we will see the light. > > Thanks. >