Yes, it would create less confusion IMvvvHO Thanks, /PA On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 10:58, Daniel Martín wrote: > Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez writes: > > > Currently, warnings are visually "enhanced" with a ⛔ sign. > > However, the warning signs are ⚠️ or its slightly different European > > version. > > I had the same question as you, but it turns out that the ⛔ icon is not > intended to represent a warning, it is a button that you can click to > *suppress* that warning type. > > Perhaps we can choose a different Emoji to avoid confusion. I don't > mind showing ⚠️ as the icon for that button, indeed. > -- Fragen sind nicht da um beantwortet zu werden, Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden Georg Kreisler Headaches with a Juju log: unit-basic-16: 09:17:36 WARNING juju.worker.uniter.operation we should run a leader-deposed hook here, but we can't yet