From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10633: Please mark invalid "; !important;" in CSS Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 03:00:58 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327802532 9496 80.91.229.3 (29 Jan 2012 02:02:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:02:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10633@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 29 03:02:11 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RrK5r-0001kw-8q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 03:02:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47467 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrK5o-0003QD-Bu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:02:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40877) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrK5k-0003LX-Lq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:02:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrK5j-00085Y-I6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:02:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39079) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrK5j-00085T-FE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:02:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrK5j-0006jY-Pc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:02:04 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lennart Borgman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:02:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10633 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10633-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10633.132780248925817 (code B ref 10633); Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:02:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10633) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2012 02:01:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42696 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrK5A-0006iM-Bq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:01:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]:63269) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrK57-0006i3-Eh for 10633@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:01:26 -0500 Original-Received: by lahl5 with SMTP id l5so1569725lah.3 for <10633@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:01:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=1NBRArujYP++gK6FMSdvzJkBc28uQWqI6MgP+VHDERo=; b=jP775/2kmvOzm5+c4HTwCZ9YS1RSkzcqyEEI2Pv4NcO94yoc2MhiXCsbhemYXXO4qx o2Z+UjH/UneMXFp3EGFP7FcmwOw87M3p0+0tbQYJX0E3gfInnAl8PB4yR89K/euwWwsg I7dWkhMNRzpAxH7Cd3xlZh5vpsFdvPbnM7j34= Original-Received: by 10.112.25.35 with SMTP id z3mr3277954lbf.52.1327802478299; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:01:18 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.97.11 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:00:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56169 Archived-At: On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 02:54, Glenn Morris wrote: > Lennart Borgman wrote: > >> Thanks, it is a great tip until it is fixed! > > Why should this be added to css-mode - do you have some data showing > that many people writing CSS make the same mistake as you? I have no idea. A lot of people are writing css files, but only a few of them probably are using "!important" (since it is a more advanced concept and needed mostly in special cases). However there are a lot of things that can go wrong when you work with things like css. The browser casch was maybe not updated, the css parser in the browser maybe did not care about the mistake in your css file - or it did care very much and misinterprets a lot after that. Trying to get things to work in different browsers is a bit difficult because of this. So at least knowning your css file is correct makes it very much easier. (I have previously tried to explain the difficulties with complities, but I am not sure anyone cared or understood. That was some years ago, though.)