From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ackerley Tng Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59381: Should xref--marker-ring be per-window? Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 21:29:45 -0800 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30789"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: 59381@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 19 10:26:45 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1owK7Z-0007qj-8R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 10:26:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owK6u-00067h-S3; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 04:26:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owK6t-00067S-HL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 04:26:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owK6t-0004XY-9Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 04:26:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1owK6t-0003Lg-5F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 04:26:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ackerley Tng Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 09:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 59381 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.166884992312799 (code B ref -1); Sat, 19 Nov 2022 09:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Nov 2022 09:25:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39010 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1owK6F-0003KG-2l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 04:25:23 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:50034) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1owGQR-0003TT-Ec for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 00:29:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owGQR-0001LC-A7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 00:29:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-vk1-xa2d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2d]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owGQP-0006tH-Ub for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 00:29:59 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-vk1-xa2d.google.com with SMTP id o24so3373823vkl.9 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 21:29:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ng0m0z3o2vNwjMnAu+DxwcAXKGfkCLgVlXQ9xqcVmP4=; b=CNunGPMk48YOnJQzxQI+YuQFC9laMhsIqrP8jOllMQCHjzEiad6d2flkhreune4MNZ sYmBbausERUZPbUVutGJRd8K33CVvzlvqz51HSOKYK+LSEoFKhpJrHjPaBfix/FasbeI jqLYnGCzgG87+TVrmiVUjL+aulMKJ+UVCQzBD6r1Gv7GNA9qSy3x4ig5eesSgOIQtdho iLLrWJXns/aw7K7BxxztiZSad9HI+8LF8SoSy2SNBAWk66pTVhdiD+FXIxiUVzCWx+DM 9CUlSkfEK/+4cvetZLPUwVCCDk/wCBtmj/9CDU4rGOVZzf5YCpW1/6HFJ6gWvo2fOwqE WbaQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ng0m0z3o2vNwjMnAu+DxwcAXKGfkCLgVlXQ9xqcVmP4=; b=GAlpKqH17MWCx5Kn6ICjW4Df/PfrQGWauo6XcTsUg1Bntm8SwJgPOfNv9cyDmuY4R0 C1RqK/AbPQi2x/xos0J/EOh+RytUtYkgxVpi2YlLUxaAX+u4cCt4fW+sw/87UM7qqkQJ DW8xIIpRUCBe1Ah4aMv8wR6ooyQdwDNYT53+LQTzbs92WnQ1yFbegvymhDMERSvCYj2j PLi0LKwAljL4d4t8xxNF2TKaH4MtpsP9Fj4XsCuzUSaEtwj9NrRsHao+cIPFhkwilsVV SFkr9+69vUs7L/FHcmUwTYjtmy8jwcnaYiFweUcx6l+gCROlkO8sl4OkfH0SlgY/3Oas qQHg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnkk9CGp+fI0n5+WC7I1bmENbwB67aeiP3oroXhMND3nFcE8blS qzCjcGNgONNLH8W5RinvISKkkArESmQ6MNCpptNUYiRpcY4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5I3o1TEnA+PDjdySV0DrMNLTwpUeag6lQ2KBjyOZwQpdOhNDkMryeXabxzTLDdunjy8arhrq4CauEqbHMhGa4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:12a7:b0:3b8:969f:97ba with SMTP id j7-20020a05612212a700b003b8969f97bamr330579vkp.0.1668835796166; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 21:29:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2d; envelope-from=ackerleytng@gmail.com; helo=mail-vk1-xa2d.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 04:25:13 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:248323 Archived-At: Hi, While using xref (xref-find-definitions and xref-find-references, etc) in separate windows, I hit M-, to pop the marker stack expecting that each window should have a separate stack. However, it seems that the entire emacs instance shares a single xref--marker ring. Could we have separate xref--marker-rings per window, or some configuration option to enable that? I have some patches that I could submit, if that helps! Thanks, Ackerley