From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Cesar Quiroz Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24682: Emacs 25 from GIT build issue under Ubuntu 16.10 Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 00:10:09 -0700 Message-ID: References: <83pon22m0d.fsf@gnu.org> <6112973d-aeda-8839-50f1-518a3d2a1a46@cs.ucla.edu> <837f98238e.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045d9aaa8f0060053ef627ce X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1476601883 14444 195.159.176.226 (16 Oct 2016 07:11:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 07:11:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes , Tim Cross , Michael Albinus , 24682@debbugs.gnu.org, Paul Eggert To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 16 09:11:18 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bvfbB-0001yH-PU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 09:11:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55312 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bvfbD-0003qv-V9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 03:11:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42478) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bvfb7-0003pj-A4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 03:11:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bvfb4-00084K-1V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 03:11:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55229) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bvfb3-00084C-Tu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 03:11:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bvfb3-0005DH-M7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 03:11:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Cesar Quiroz Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 07:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24682 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24682-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24682.147660183820009 (code B ref 24682); Sun, 16 Oct 2016 07:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24682) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2016 07:10:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33185 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bvfag-0005Cf-96 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 03:10:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f50.google.com ([209.85.214.50]:35988) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bvfad-0005CQ-RC for 24682@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 03:10:36 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f50.google.com with SMTP id 139so18013272itm.1 for <24682@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 00:10:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dmXcAkn/VM3LiM93tBt3r6PU2yNpzkk7jTYAOgye7xE=; b=WtXtHNrl69LsysGP0pE1Ay9j97uEZA/E6cCKsGTZ3u1zwXV52yvgMDaVwmFbuGCvC1 grRctIdhRFlP9ZM+aHlflbt4BxdN6hknbuatfZlJ4FzlrAKFYBoNjgCljlGMo0fAntzY JWnWx3yMWwUqBYM1tzabfRctHy0gQXM4iw2LTsH9VL5gTmXI94fyUBPbSdnNpr8DJ+yg I1DsBnVbreDQN8Bg3uw8sdp8tvp+TbvOx3XlFqsAfBceq8wfi5JVd3ioiCnzaHl1UBnV PECMq+iKG8r76mUZfe0bfaRZqnQLZR9WBSap7cW+Quuf1v2uCQsahbMSlVG84+DJW4R/ zDSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dmXcAkn/VM3LiM93tBt3r6PU2yNpzkk7jTYAOgye7xE=; b=XB2y3Eoi6Cn/CdImcl1r22SJ/8Vmzi3rDdUyNQTAjNiADekySQgWQiXWgsMtbUDFbc tykfyzY5SDlyu4SJmofl76i2L7YUjqOcg/VIcSlQFkLsKV+018IxY5usaWavhvGRvqeA kH/gtcHMC01VOm7gCyz6BvRES2dVO/Dib9FTW5TSNym+SYMVw9J5cYzzlysDwF+jhS2y FhTckZlRwp90VIZhSl55Bo9tGYJKWF6nBdrT53oacJjo7/cdH5sFb7US+rlBh66OJCsh ArFfjy6NmUGys44L2sEz3UZkwf0LVCJqN4S8+/HCig+iMdWaPZxkEqFARY3XHSIOpq/h vfHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkJlcHCmyfBAOu8JJ/MG7bq3B/zrCJsowu/zHhlNOVLZLSl5KudYzy+WbpMRaFqYBvVce3EI2uvMVqTGA== X-Received: by 10.36.181.78 with SMTP id j14mr4147315iti.20.1476601830111; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 00:10:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.79.1.149 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 00:10:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <837f98238e.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:124537 Archived-At: --f403045d9aaa8f0060053ef627ce Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Probably just clone the -nopie AC check macro with -no-pie, and just pass whichever, if any, wins. --C=C3=A9sar On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Cesar Quiroz > > Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 22:31:46 -0700 > > Cc: Michael Albinus , 24682@debbugs.gnu.org, > > =C3=93scar Fuentes , Eli Zaretskii = , > > Tim Cross > > > > -no-pie versus -nopie > > > > There was something in the release notes about -no-pie being the > standard negation of -pie, while -nopie was > > introduced (by Debian?) to deal with the issue. > > > > Relevant snippet from config.log: > > > > configure:31624: checking whether gcc accepts -nopie > > configure:31644: gcc -o conftest -no-pie -nopie conftest.c >&5 > > gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-nopie'; did you mean > '-no-pie'? > > configure:31644: $? =3D 1 > > I guess the fix, whatever it is, should be backported to the release > branch? > --f403045d9aaa8f0060053ef627ce Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Probably just clone the -nopie AC check macro with -no-pie= , and just pass whichever, if any, wins.
--C=C3=A9sar

On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Eli Zarets= kii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> = From: Cesar Quiroz <cesar.quir= oz@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 22:31:46 -0700
> Cc: Michael Albinus <mich= ael.albinus@gmx.de>, 24682@= debbugs.gnu.org,
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=C3=93scar Fuentes <ofv@wanadoo.es>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Tim Cross <theophilusx@gmail.com>
>
> -no-pie versus -nopie
>
> There was something in the release notes about -no-pie being the stand= ard negation of -pie, while -nopie was
> introduced (by Debian?) to deal with the issue.
>
> Relevant snippet from config.log:
>
> configure:31624: checking whether gcc accepts -nopie
> configure:31644: gcc -o conftest -no-pie -nopie conftest.c >&5<= br> > gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-nopie'; did you= mean '-no-pie'?
> configure:31644: $? =3D 1

I guess the fix, whatever it is, should be backported to the release=
branch?

--f403045d9aaa8f0060053ef627ce--