Thank you. Will save confusion for people.

On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 7:30 AM kobarity <kobarity@gmail.com> wrote:

> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >
> > > From: Ship Mints <shipmints@gmail.com>
> > > Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 09:53:15 -0400
> > >
> > > Greetings. Curious if I'm barking up the wrong tree with this
> assessment...
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 2:33 PM Ship Mints <shipmints@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >  An example of a personal hack to make this work could be to add
> something like this to a
> > >  python-mode-hook:
> > >
> > >  (if (derived-mode-p 'python-base-mode)
> > >    (setq local-abbrev-table python-base-mode-abbrev-table))
> > >
> > >  On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 2:15 PM Ship Mints <shipmints@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >  I was expecting that python-base-mode-abbrev-table would apply to
> both python-mode and
> > >  python-ts-mode buffers. python-ts-mode doesn't derive from
> python-mode so the abbrev tables
> > >  aren't shared by default. Unless I'm missing something, using a base
> table doesn't work for me.
> > >
> > >  (define-abbrev-table 'python-mode-abbrev-table ()
> > >    "Abbrev table for Python mode."
> > >  ;; should this:
> > >    :parents (list python-mode-skeleton-abbrev-table))
> > >  ;; be defined thusly?
> > >    :parents (list python-base-mode-abbrev-table
> python-mode-skeleton-abbrev-table))
> > >
> > >  I tried to find guidance on this outside of hacking abbrev tables
> manually to be shared. Perhaps
> > >  other people have the same expectation.
> >
> > kobarity, any comments?
>
> It seems to me that the skeletons should be defined in
> python-base-mode.  How about the attached patch?
>