I use below to compute adjusted colors given that lighten doesn't work when
black multipliers are all zero.

(defun my/color-rgb-transform-by-frac (c1 c2 frac)
  "Compute RGB color from C1 adjusted closer to C2 by FRAC.
FRAC is a floating-point number between 0 and 1."
  (cl-destructuring-bind (c1-r c1-g c1-b) c1
    (cl-destructuring-bind (c2-r c2-g c2-b) c2
      (list (+ c1-r (* (- c2-r c1-r) frac))
            (+ c1-g (* (- c2-g c1-g) frac))
            (+ c1-b (* (- c2-b c1-b) frac))))))

(defun my/color-hex-transform-by-frac (c1 c2 frac)
  "Compute hex color from C1 adjusted closer to C2 by FRAC.
FRAC is a floating-point number between 0 and 1."
  (apply #'color-rgb-to-hex
         (my/color-rgb-transform-by-frac (color-name-to-rgb c1)
                                         (color-name-to-rgb c2)
                                         frac)))

;; e.g.,
(my/color-hex-transform-by-frac "black"
                                "white"
                                0.10) ; produces "#199919991999"
(color-lighten-name "black" 10) ; produces "#000000000000"

On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 8:40 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
> > Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 09:27:29 +0100
> >
> > The function color-lighten-name doesn't work as I would expect for
> > black:
> >
> >   (color-lighten-name "#000000" 50)
> >   => "#000000000000"
> >
> > I think there is even a test that checks that, in color-tests.el:
> >
> > (ert-deftest color-tests-lighten-name ()
> >   (should (equal (color-lighten-name "black" 100) "#000000000000"))
> >
> > I don't understand this, and it is different from what I'd expect, and
> > tools for the web return, for example
> >
> >   https://mdigi.tools/lighten-color/#000000
>
> Our notion of "lighten color" seems to be to increase the color's
> luminance by P percent.  Since the black color's luminance is zero,
> increasing that by 50% still yields zero.
>
> By contrast, the page you point to seems to interpret "lighten" to
> mean that P is the percentage of the full scale, not of the original
> color's luminance.
>
> This goes back to commit 656c2dd66e, which was supposed to fix
> bug#54514.  But maybe Noah's interpretation of "lighten" was
> incorrect, and we should revert that change?  OTOH, if we do revert
> it, then Noah's example will disagree with the above page.
>
> So I guess our algorithm is incorrect somewhere?
>
> Adding Julien and Mattias, in the hope that they could help unconfuse
> us.
>
>
>
>