> I'm open to changing the default alist. Are you open to devising such a
patch?

Sorry, I don’t have the knowledge to provide an appropriate patch. :(

Thanks for opening it to change the default settings, though.

On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 4:54 AM Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no> wrote:

>
>
> On 29 April 2023 13:00:59 CEST, Jen-Chieh Shen <jcs090218@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> The patch I can envision is to change the default c-offsets-alist.
> >But IMO we should only do that if many/most C# programs use the style
> >suggested by the OP.
> >
> >Just want to mention, the style conflicts with Visual Studio IDE (probably
> >VSCode too), and Microsoft creates C#. It's probably a good idea to match
> >with these tool.
> >
> >I don't know what’s the prefer C# style guides in the old days, but I’ve
> >been using C# 8+ years and I know it has always been this way (the one
> with
> >expected behavior).
> >
> >LMKWYT?
> >
>
> I'm open to changing the default alist. Are you open to devising such a
> patch?
>
> Theo
>
> >
> >On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 3:48 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> >> > Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2023 12:40:30 +0200
> >> > From: Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no>
> >> > CC: 63141@debbugs.gnu.org, jostein@kjonigsen.net
> >> >
> >> > >> (c-add-style "csharp"
> >> > >>              '("java"
> >> > >>                (c-basic-offset . 4)
> >> > >>                (c-comment-only-line-offset . (0 . 0))
> >> > >>                (c-offsets-alist . ((inline-open           . 0)
> >> > >>                                    (arglist-intro         . +)
> >> > >>                                    (arglist-close         . 0)
> >> > >>                                    (inexpr-class          . 0)
> >> > >>                                    (case-label            . +)
> >> > >>                                    (cpp-macro             .
> >> c-lineup-dont-change)
> >> > >>                                    (substatement-open     . 0)))))
> >> > >> ```
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I consider it an awkward indentation, so better to change the
> default
> >> (change to the expected
> >> > >> behavior).
> >> > >
> >> > >I'll let Theo and Jostein chime in regarding the accepted practices
> in
> >> > >C#, but in general it is not enough to hear from one or several users
> >> > >that they don't like the defaults in order for us to change the
> >> > >default behavior.  These customization options exist precisely so
> that
> >> > >people who don't like the defaults could easily adjust Emacs to their
> >> > >liking.  Why would you impose your personal preferences on everyone
> >> > >else, instead of letting them customize this as they see fit?
> >> >
> >> > I agree. It's not a bug, but could absolutely be a missing
> >> feature/consideration. I'd be happy to review a patch with the proposed
> >> changes, though.
> >>
> >> The patch I can envision is to change the default c-offsets-alist.
> >> But IMO we should only do that if many/most C# programs use the style
> >> suggested by the OP.
> >>
>