From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Semrau Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37562: 26.2; Obsolete vt-control and vt100-led Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 12:45:10 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83h84tbpxl.fsf@gnu.org> <87r22kz5bx.fsf@marxist.se> <83bltng3s2.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9rud715.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000017a3dc0596d451fe" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="16135"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Stefan Kangas , 37562@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 08 15:10:28 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iT4y3-00044t-Ro for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 15:10:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54948 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iT4y1-0006Mz-NB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 09:10:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34620) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iT4wi-00054x-8p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 09:09:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iT4wg-0004D3-Sy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 09:09:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36244) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iT4wg-0004CX-QK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 09:09:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iT4wg-0000Sw-JO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 09:09:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Nicolas Semrau Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 14:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37562 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37562-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37562.15732221061728 (code B ref 37562); Fri, 08 Nov 2019 14:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37562) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Nov 2019 14:08:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45063 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iT4w5-0000Rh-DB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 09:08:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-il1-f175.google.com ([209.85.166.175]:47088) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iT2hi-0001DX-SD for 37562@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 06:45:27 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-il1-f175.google.com with SMTP id q1so4171732ile.13 for <37562@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 03:45:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=n48ZH1059fw+hGRMOuIZskZ6Vq1vR+ipVtlo5nYckz8=; b=acqMq6wYwXUHYzEgcUrT8+kDunojINIfAVuF8Oowfrffq6Ym42GAXyuLavTuKvnLHC 9qRFxr7pSR7DX7+wHZR3LEleDexoBPTa9lOeKa9hU2jqsNfCDiRLC7J5JfeDvVaAO+AU YsOs7QIQhwWC3MH+PDqHKBgdd/6DN0gctYc/45HVH7EODdpDlFQe/rf6Pqs/9btPRcmY IS//TjByTu1TQv0PbDcRROHp/XEpPshWAQPKc9N9Zmkik3OBb+5bXmlO/eOjQPLOuaaf 0VN2JiHaryopqbhGVrCWjgZvs1Xyd/BUdwBKtwbQeRtafpwiN9P0DE5eMEqMy4JAtqDS zmTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=n48ZH1059fw+hGRMOuIZskZ6Vq1vR+ipVtlo5nYckz8=; b=Drke6Z1gRrSh8Ud3h8Sh6tB6YK1gchRQim5/71AbUGBdyIK0L+NIqbzhaqpzqoh5QJ OzOYQrkqUzWMV+wq0kiWP7PLtbvl5/ofNyiRoEDFJVJyiv+PkJhMU4YsnuJKlh9Ahi0T n2TrGdQ0R/WYzIJtYcUonkKdXpMqNHkcfTzpjWebWP9YWdA0r5ED23rODbSa2SYUl/QF Wnb/lVxqRip5TYDcdGRfPKh9ilxop8RUy0b4+eT60juCn1jkl2PdYbL/HDqnZdNfYyLN c3nW81AWrULXwxOp3c/2k2Eg9Jo+Ahh69kItV1b+yaNo+luD+julVbTPHh0ivzIZS3bu AEow== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWfUoQidS549qvGokuk9CZtsgd6W00RrUqQMeoZMfs/n4ivHAML sBck5GunxYQGcpoLyO4S1ratcpsGYNZYcFKzlDY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxfvUHYCniggN3d5KD4izf1MKTy9D3zn8Cfy4jX3QMgc+lcbcrQ6L3om8l1vCig9hF8ndhf4s1PNmy5xO6Lpdk= X-Received: by 2002:a92:889c:: with SMTP id m28mr11572028ilh.157.1573213521288; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 03:45:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83v9rud715.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 09:08:22 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:171215 Archived-At: --00000000000017a3dc0596d451fe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > There's no tangible benefit in obsoleting these tiny files. So files like this will probably stay in the codebase indefinitely? I am aware that they do not make Emacs "worse", performance-wise. I just think linting files for those unused stone-age systems is beneficial at least in the sense of alleviating a certain "museum piece vibe" of Emacs. Am Fr., 8. Nov. 2019 um 10:58 Uhr schrieb Eli Zaretskii : > > From: Stefan Kangas > > Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 01:02:35 +0100 > > Cc: nicolas.semrau@gmail.com, 37562@debbugs.gnu.org, > > Stefan Monnier > > > > Would it make sense to mark them as obsolete and if anyone complains > > to create a new ELPA package for them instead? We could even say in > > NEWS that, in case anyone is still using this, we would appreciate it > > if they reported back to emacs-devel or somesuch. (I think I've seen > > that being done once before, so there is some precedent.) > > > > My objective in writing this is to figure out a way forward for the > > original request/suggestion, but I don't feel very strongly about it. > > However, if we can't find a reasonable way to do this, or if we don't > > want to, I think we're better off closing this as wontfix. > > I prefer the latter. This issue is so minor that we've already > invested way too much energy in it. There's no tangible benefit in > obsoleting these tiny files. > --00000000000017a3dc0596d451fe Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> There's no tangible benefit in o= bsoleting these tiny files.

So files like this wil= l probably stay in the codebase indefinitely?

I am aware that they d= o not make Emacs "worse", performance-wise. I
just think linti= ng files for those unused stone-age systems is
beneficial at least in th= e sense of alleviating a certain "museum
piece vibe" of Emacs.=
Am Fr., 8. Nov. 2019 um 10:58=C2=A0Uhr schrieb Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-l= eft:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">> From: Stefan Kangas &= lt;stefan@marxist.se= >
> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 01:02:35 +0100
> Cc: nico= las.semrau@gmail.com, 37562@debbugs.gnu.org,
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
>
> Would it make sense to mark them as obsolete and if anyone complains > to create a new ELPA package for them instead?=C2=A0 We could even say= in
> NEWS that, in case anyone is still using this, we would appreciate it<= br> > if they reported back to emacs-devel or somesuch.=C2=A0 (I think I'= ;ve seen
> that being done once before, so there is some precedent.)
>
> My objective in writing this is to figure out a way forward for the > original request/suggestion, but I don't feel very strongly about = it.
> However, if we can't find a reasonable way to do this, or if we do= n't
> want to, I think we're better off closing this as wontfix.

I prefer the latter.=C2=A0 This issue is so minor that we've already invested way too much energy in it.=C2=A0 There's no tangible benefit i= n
obsoleting these tiny files.
--00000000000017a3dc0596d451fe--