On Fri, Aug 5, 2022, 8:18 AM Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:

> Lynn Winebarger <owinebar@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Isn't call-interactively only used in the context of requesting user
> > input?  That would seem unlikely to benefit from optimization.
>
> Some interactive specs are pretty involved, and definitely benefit from
> being compiled, so we're not going to stop doing that.
>

Maybe it's only an issue in the "advice" case?  I can try removing it from
the customization variable but leave it in the hard coded list in the
advice--add-function code, if that would make a difference.

Lynn