From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24091: 24.5; High CPU usage at startup while hidden Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 12:21:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <24533f31-9fc2-b38e-aaeb-561616cdf77f@gmail.com> <87shut9pyk.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83lh0lq9n5.fsf@gnu.org> <83oa5fp1zb.fsf@gnu.org> <877fbkw7b1.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83inv1fnf9.fsf@gnu.org> <83zinodghv.fsf@gnu.org> <83y438de6m.fsf@gnu.org> <57CBCE4F.5040705@gmx.at> <57CC1E5F.8010107@gmx.at> <57CC4435.7040503@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1473006223 17466 195.159.176.226 (4 Sep 2016 16:23:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 16:23:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Aiken , =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel , 24091@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 04 18:23:37 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bgaCh-0003Ew-Fq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 18:23:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50491 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bgaCf-0001i0-2B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 12:23:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57354) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bgaBL-0000c4-8O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 12:22:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bgaBG-0007wb-7u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 12:22:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52151) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bgaBG-0007wX-4a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 12:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bgaBG-0006AX-0R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 12:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2016 16:22:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24091 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 24091-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24091.147300608723669 (code B ref 24091); Sun, 04 Sep 2016 16:22:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24091) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2016 16:21:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49863 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bgaAh-00069h-6A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 12:21:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-f49.google.com ([209.85.218.49]:35944) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bgaAg-00069W-9o for 24091@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 12:21:26 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f49.google.com with SMTP id w78so32373061oie.3 for <24091@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 09:21:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=drwJNaU6RIO+VB3EOCxDQBlow2860aqpq6UuLEbMeTY=; b=eg3yW5tER74lfF2yqKrxdh+KU2vFIEuPCH8lDs2B/OBBY8l6fuqqcV5lpbPoF/RZB4 SA2S5zZ95zSdUyX1MGXPObPTf9G0TN2QFoxmvkabLucqj9hwNTTtGoN5Mn9C/TYNMsP5 vZwKVu/Wy26LgZREleUYQpt/Zusl0EmhS0lmm8OS5NteZ12nmazrrMi46y554CnhGl3U FisJtoyfgBSz423IGlYiZ/TguDW2RGnuUZPDzUZNTEnzatklFxtPyq2NX38Eec0SF0gB qgGYG8ryAaRZsiUS2QzY52cCynLRd6lN4tesWa1yQXS7LLjh7bljwqWzw6S5quUmsQMV ST/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=drwJNaU6RIO+VB3EOCxDQBlow2860aqpq6UuLEbMeTY=; b=O0IxnkqcrO2JT7CYuC3UtdEpwulhiRQ1KrJe0Pcvg82KawlLL8pEdPcfLF5IoakdvN 1ZhZnjj0mBQ+M7nwP9LfYVsWWOgwh37bRc/rNgwVyQkVz1hwVyoZGiT+kEPl/jA12PfN qN6Rr18QxjUDZJn7R6FckJkYB2JeHH1Pl7z45Rt0LXDHPuECqVWY4JySna5ILJcBzhon SdvMpQ9wMl4QTQnRGED+NVEh8Ejcwg4pL4HWEJO045587y+BHsOfxkF51f5AybrKErnV eMV72E0gDRqraIHeIYmC9/TY4cNqNULWhHbxN1Qmoq27L+IeNjnG/HCNArWwsJpvM5je ancA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPovJeJJg+l+US/SZr49mZ5k2ZgOxDhA5DPkXQNa4c3M0SNMGBPkDvsx8V/g56X341PVQcbUy9Xj5tx6A== X-Received: by 10.202.195.73 with SMTP id t70mr4657623oif.202.1473006080734; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 09:21:20 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.157.7.195 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Sep 2016 09:21:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57CC4435.7040503@gmx.at> X-Google-Sender-Auth: vyIw8ju_VUPWm_6lFKdyn_0iqIs X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:122936 Archived-At: On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 11:56 AM, martin rudalics wrote: > In x_make_frame_visible we have this loop: > > while (!FRAME_VISIBLE_P (f)) > > What I wanted to know is whether the frame f here is the _same_ frame > you see in x_top_window_to_frame where IIUC > > if (wdesc == XtWindow (x->widget)) > return f; Oh, I see. Yes, it is the same frame.