From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6991: Please keep bytecode out of *Backtrace* buffers Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 19:33:30 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8739tm9vzl.fsf@jidanni.org> <87vb5ct1lz.fsf@gnus.org> <2223f654-1e67-4a9a-a471-828fd4078410@default> <87fumokzbp.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83oa1bc3x2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1hrlek2.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83eg27bjah.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8cvlcmk.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <8360njb9o5.fsf@gnu.org> <877f7zksm0.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83oa1a9msk.fsf@gnu.org> <83vavf73ei.fsf@gnu.org> <8360ne6v1q.fsf@gnu.org> <874m2ujh2v.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480206857 11639 195.159.176.226 (27 Nov 2016 00:34:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 00:34:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , John Wiegley , Stefan Monnier , 6991@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 27 01:34:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cAnQ4-0001vA-E5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 01:34:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52199 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAnQ7-0003KH-CR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 19:34:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34510) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAnPz-0003K8-JE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 19:34:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAnPu-0001u7-Sf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 19:34:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55596) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAnPu-0001u3-Oq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 19:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cAnPu-00080g-GC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 19:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 00:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6991 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6991-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6991.148020681830756 (code B ref 6991); Sun, 27 Nov 2016 00:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6991) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2016 00:33:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42762 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cAnPV-000800-Sy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 19:33:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-f45.google.com ([209.85.218.45]:34199) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cAnPU-0007zo-Ut for 6991@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 19:33:37 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f45.google.com with SMTP id y198so115692127oia.1 for <6991@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 16:33:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=nbzYbc/pLJZTU/Zuw1iyVgEJummTRiqZqLHKLb+rTSI=; b=cbF0SW6cvZewGwglDnkjLFseAfN3tgLAK7HaN/6z4q7NoKUo/5RDldZAUZDOT0Ai2K lMvrzzNC28dE1wX7XPmyldQ2CTO3ZR6hdcxGUQmSK7ldlg1KTIDJqEKpLEnbNj4sLbFd 1EVD5XEjsW9is45bbqvMTkOmYfT/SLJn3tIYZqDXF8N1bN4fvjmTYHld1p/4f5YHr4/f V+cRMI0DTGy2xfN6VNllNkmEmojG3vdF64f6ncGs1+JL8KADPdgZg3ymAwAGUVj0x0GC HAnGxr8UgsxUrv72c7z4cT934kfTCNjtO7xVrDHBzjezZs09PHQnUoXIWTdUNZwQwK/M mrIQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nbzYbc/pLJZTU/Zuw1iyVgEJummTRiqZqLHKLb+rTSI=; b=fexaxes9ra0M8ayDF2Ttdjs3vrVncUkEl6M7vhM7Ysrgumt26IvW4wfEMDY0fUIpy3 3ZvB4oPHtq4S70RpIeA/uaPdLO4NBRob6r0DRzDxuER3GMfqsjy72ER+tTt1l45faJUX kDf+Y1O0+5WUilDr2wWhfk2/Zkc3jGwaOfhJGb/pp0swsgkf3TVq435D4edrjQN/wk94 Cy5UQX2qK8UDW6LSYjH0CbDO4RTmguID6nXIQKf6onr666M6GqD3rTnZKuYE84/0Ce51 cAeJTjM+yAYNbAqEBkUC+0pecUfI5Hq3QHq4URRrhoFzRHcyWGswu0M7WHErD+HxAnwD AEag== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00mI0l4GdHkhPHtdZxq3wD9dzyysQMWv/RP1GWDZnWLOv8jnS2mt8phi0v5egO1zdJrIO45Fo1U223IIg== X-Received: by 10.157.58.119 with SMTP id j110mr8223803otc.208.1480206811198; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 16:33:31 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.157.4.67 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 16:33:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: Wip0YTYUifr-ChAToCWrCwB7efY X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126139 Archived-At: On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Richard Stallman wrote: > > Why not take the bytecode _entirely_ out of the backtrace buffer? > Is it ever any use? It can be disassembled, and may hold useful information that would otherwise be missing. > > I proposed a week ago to print bytecode functions differently, > without showing the bytecode. I think it might make sense to hide the bytecode with display properties, but keep the text itself so that it's not lost when copied to an email.