From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6991: Please keep bytecode out of *Backtrace* buffers Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 09:10:50 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8739tm9vzl.fsf@jidanni.org> <87vb5ct1lz.fsf@gnus.org> <2223f654-1e67-4a9a-a471-828fd4078410@default> <87fumokzbp.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83oa1bc3x2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1hrlek2.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83eg27bjah.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8cvlcmk.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <8360njb9o5.fsf@gnu.org> <877f7zksm0.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83oa1a9msk.fsf@gnu.org> <83vavf73ei.fsf@gnu.org> <8360ne6v1q.fsf@gnu.org> <874m2ujh2v.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83bmx11tn2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480255934 30511 195.159.176.226 (27 Nov 2016 14:12:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:12:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, Juanma Barranquero , John Wiegley , Stefan Monnier , 6991@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 27 15:12:10 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cB0Bd-00078m-Tw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 15:12:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54413 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cB0Bh-0007Lp-O2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 09:12:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34253) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cB0Ba-0007KY-1g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 09:12:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cB0BW-0007lP-5q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 09:12:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55815) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cB0BW-0007lE-1t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 09:12:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cB0BV-0005T4-O7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 09:12:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6991 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6991-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6991.148025586520948 (code B ref 6991); Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6991) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2016 14:11:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42981 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cB0AX-0005Ra-IV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 09:11:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com ([209.85.218.46]:36615) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cB0AS-0005RC-LG for 6991@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 09:11:00 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id v84so124483832oie.3 for <6991@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 06:10:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=ovXjm+DzCqhwit2/amo0DgOrAgvNorNvRilghmoYdeE=; b=iRL2GB3BKz5ET/h1/QWJbJaCwzLgXEjbB7psRLDjm3UsIB4GGNojaQVhuA8cLRM6Ax IHC6vYig5Bd2gb/SpShqaehp6IZphQOibQS2d71UZYGYCrZk7dRfLr2s2GzyH3HlhqDK Yv/ocQ/z37m3JOxjy/IEr0xR033FE45eSOdwt0yAZMd5zdcVxo2sP2iP3ou8pNDJg3B9 EVHadoG5rMeXuOkr2U+/gJn8nDPkCxe5ygKsmwEaQEl+lGpJ9Zzdg06J2FDgpExkGrAF RSm/0yKDhpKTrqVpDxcZHPW1yv4AQ6974shLByAdcxz+WPfy5I51Ge0zgwzhRfCSC+U1 63IA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ovXjm+DzCqhwit2/amo0DgOrAgvNorNvRilghmoYdeE=; b=WqYFQskbTKR8U+psL8AqVx6+cEdguyZ7NJeG3oQ32VysT2w5G/Zs0tncsMMY1HYA1y xrVdsqD+jrF00EeJKd/DTGRiqqQ9h9UmhT+++CfjDgmPeeYXC3x7NFX5Fx/IsYa1ZvTP AF1EpN60Tek46yX2EwzUEu3LCU+1vT2Bw7bMFK+KaO797AJf+pDrGGt+x0KVeDF58Lv1 mO6QHSQTpznMDhWpIcdWRHwD0p37t/v+aD2aBmCF+KJH6/3lghaD0Rhq5RstSzra64kH qTaAUBnuYm9OhP6fpb6fi1/0vOrYcXJVltbs+Cn9QWTTi+9OJev1NH1rEPxF309/S1Ob /pqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01BBJO2HArYFg9H2tHwhWZcI4FMONWCP2a5LIBwFo3l5Md6gfvFp4hmDz4bM2AvPYcDrlzw85ATuf6t+w== X-Received: by 10.157.17.89 with SMTP id p25mr10566637otp.239.1480255851160; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 06:10:51 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.157.4.67 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 06:10:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83bmx11tn2.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8QxMtKhU8ekffISGaiCbdBljMlg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126159 Archived-At: On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Noam Postavsky >> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 19:33:30 -0500 >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Juanma Barranquero , John Wiegley , >> Stefan Monnier , 6991@debbugs.gnu.org, >> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen >> >> I think it might make sense to hide the bytecode with display >> properties, but keep the text itself so that it's not lost when copied >> to an email. > > Text properties won't prevent the hidden text from being copied. Yes, that was my intention.