From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size" Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 22:56:18 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83insov1zr.fsf@gnu.org> <87zilztzd5.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83oa2ftnvp.fsf@gnu.org> <87wph2ts1a.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83oa2erx0k.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgxht8hp.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <871sz8kq2v.fsf@gmail.com> <87shroroh8.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <838ttfpnxt.fsf@gnu.org> <83vawjo21l.fsf@gnu.org> <83bmybnopx.fsf@gnu.org> <8360ojnk0n.fsf@gnu.org> <83twc3m198.fsf@gnu.org> <83pomrlz27.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2cynabi.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg35swni.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83eg2ohsb8.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478491056 10936 195.159.176.226 (7 Nov 2016 03:57:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 03:57:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Sam Halliday , 24358@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 07 04:57:30 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c3b3Z-0008RW-Oc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 04:57:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50868 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3b3c-0001O1-Cg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 22:57:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42481) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3b3S-0001Lv-6I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 22:57:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3b3O-0000fe-Rq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 22:57:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3b3O-0000fR-Oq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 22:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c3b3O-0000mz-Fj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 22:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 03:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24358 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch fixed Original-Received: via spool by 24358-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24358.14784909862990 (code B ref 24358); Mon, 07 Nov 2016 03:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24358) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2016 03:56:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47370 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c3b2o-0000mA-Jp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 22:56:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f52.google.com ([209.85.214.52]:37421) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c3b2n-0000lw-Eo for 24358@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 22:56:25 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f52.google.com with SMTP id u205so100577298itc.0 for <24358@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 19:56:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=3nK37w6Fn79u68AI5zVpGSaEmHue2KivjqfI7UDIyys=; b=u12mD83Ml7Sj4pyHsXByTYzOcIplTCoqv6oQKDu1BKd0EuSFHivXNzDfl/2us1w4Ec vpYpipmmbDt6NG+r8uAsq6a/7nT2VCe6Fyr+1LKdKElkqd2RlDaUIV6Kn76Y4ldi1/JZ MalmkKPUkpU+VVYM/FAUhH31+F4J1/FHYF4aNFcTLL77FW8sWe2O/klmdD4mfq+1B+Rr 5aXsoTskKVKHeDj2YtJbNqkwDqG6YLJz/8EQF2yLRJ8uZRiZt9FQkN6HAR/QODuFs5Sw LoVTTQnNrCMJ/d7RQ9DVEkJ26iIhSPgvvQGGXsaafmbF/GXEzCR69mDk0l7TfCLI5IZI evlQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3nK37w6Fn79u68AI5zVpGSaEmHue2KivjqfI7UDIyys=; b=FxepyMroW3uRs+KqF+dzrUV/LChHrLf9PnBZTUyv0xSGQhy2qNPiEnXR1vwVRTlcd8 hrR7eaJdcnqJgTgSwFb2iKXiyqYdl8Hj0PxG49L0EGExg7cTUgI1a4OCqWFQRvZiKUDh F8KzzRLkjQ4irRRONaLgFVTDYaAdrTm/j17Zp8Y8oti3+kevPoYwafK0cqD0wRI+DXJH IJjTyVCOeD+rcd2hS9HTdP7prUJmodvlLRKeWDjCNkWobvbCH3w7fgp46zPam2iJbWWO lueXib/HoXtIkMP2ON2YN5twKrPSSjVlgEoj0z8LpQP86jnfOGpkOYytEV0f2Eh0ta3Q 4aUg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdoTXZ6Fslpoa7mqlEqBt9h3s/fU1ERgMDrWXeT55IChx0ny4ph3ilF7QmEhEeLSVoisEq9xaqVoqj7ww== X-Received: by 10.202.90.3 with SMTP id o3mr3046942oib.46.1478490979684; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 19:56:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.157.4.86 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:56:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83eg2ohsb8.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: l_wA7aTILM1UsfW6Kqwmn4BYDIE X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:125408 Archived-At: On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Sam Halliday >> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 21:13:33 +0100 >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 24358@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> I built 96ac0c3 and got a problem with the same part of the build, but >> this time at 10%. Apologies, I don't have the free time to do another >> debug run on it tonight. >> >> I tried with REL_ALLOC=no and that builds fine! Thank you for the >> workaround. I will still try to help with debug info. > > Is there anything else we should do about this bug? Or can it be > closed? Actually, it was never officially reopened when Sam reported the problems with the first patch. There have been 2 more independent reports that applying this (and the other rel_alloc related fixes) to 25.1 solves the crashing: bug #24821 (which I've merged to this one), and https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2016-10/msg00917.html, so I think we're good.