From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29597: 26.0.90; line-number-display-width returns incorrect width Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:39:09 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1512624891.1385920.1196858744.3908725A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1512697446.3649570.1197990904.2822A9C1@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87d13qf07e.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <1512700351.3662600.1198017792.20921918@webmail.messagingengine.com> <838tedw9el.fsf@gnu.org> <831sk5w6xb.fsf@gnu.org> <83zi6tuqsv.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1512772817 1073 195.159.176.226 (8 Dec 2017 22:40:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 22:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Rankin , 29597@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 08 23:40:10 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNRJR-0008T5-70 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 23:40:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39301 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNRJW-0006b5-PU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:40:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38325) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNRJO-0006aX-Jg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:40:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNRJK-0002S0-7a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:40:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44297) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNRJK-0002Rg-2b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNRJJ-0000eW-PR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:40:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 22:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29597 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 29597-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29597.15127727592456 (code B ref 29597); Fri, 08 Dec 2017 22:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29597) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2017 22:39:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52978 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNRIc-0000dY-OZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:39:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:43289) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNRIZ-0000dJ-VG for 29597@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:39:16 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id n138so5484166wmg.2 for <29597@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 14:39:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=VQW+ndeCt+upj5UCEboI3x2DXKFdciRvCucKcUGbgpA=; b=Mr8WGtjiPchO4m1oqla+p5rPVFt7yIKx/WPSE5CAxE6EnHLcFZhxUJpf3mhKwy+Pxg nWns66nza7jS6kJfy7L+Mf8Gb7MR3VvIfsVeqTz/Omw8ezJBvDizL9x1I0HGZaY8hYNX Z35l9yohbLD4tdJWQeqfoeExmHnqaN3fXbbOEOxSe1nidDGPvw0WjqelXTW4AGpdkZfx Y8RQREZE05PTqSODytz4W1p39/Rr0KBf6XvNF3BG7VLpMzmoKVdtHzqqWIKw1nZmgr+z r/e1PirUcZZlMB1XFiaePXcJHojKpkAhJg+kFmySKMl/F9DMv8+wqYbN/b3X6CE2iAk4 Tw9g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VQW+ndeCt+upj5UCEboI3x2DXKFdciRvCucKcUGbgpA=; b=HiFr1e2hxd/zuXZa2TuWDx4olsHsmijMVb52T+fHAJYhUpN5sax3wGFcnItX4D92yW t839CNClw6WVvWmVse4SEUqDG8TDLnUkeu93J3OTaXYh2Aavwy+yODwngg9q2/a2TB5p xkmXyavB5ikFfOlRmjagVWfynr3BGOdflAkzQLxs44HxKfD2FiTAX9fHl8GewLyhOMAb B4f635DSZl6yRqStxqcf2+bkysHsACq7VG8btdOj4Tvo/OlGQARYLWRk3WTV0+RqP4PN y1CBeY9rW5cTxiO9IIayxJUx8yRSjnPv/oaiSFpANhflE1oi12fUfDYPAMe20Xzhp2/Y 3THg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLc1e0PQB5TcextRIDfsCNE0uvVVbWPQf1c0s3/JYBjhd4xUtDP wcuoKesLebtGZEWq/0QvZsV0rh9snd5NbLJrmJ4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaeaRlrlz5jLJOV9Ximtbc76dJ4SMaywpO/Kqu4DK9jWv/dJE8SGjVeJszlOfqn3KGqo7fi+l5AESKyNHoD2bM= X-Received: by 10.28.198.75 with SMTP id w72mr5433768wmf.2.1512772750198; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 14:39:10 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.223.151.116 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:39:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83zi6tuqsv.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: h_i2P2BlR5U1b0egbtBNC-qOcH8 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:140841 Archived-At: On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Noam Postavsky >> Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 11:23:18 -0500 >> Cc: Paul Rankin , 29597@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> > I don't object to such trivial wrappers, although I'd raise a brow if >> > I saw something like this in Emacs. It sounds too trivial to have 2 >> > more symbols in the name-space. But that's me. >> >> Is the symbol space really a scarce resource? > > Not really scarce, but do you really feel good with such trivial > wrappers? Do we have anything similar anywhere else? Flag parameters are pretty common in Emacs, but it doesn't make me feel better about them. I feel pretty okay about wrappers. For other examples, string-match-p is a fairly trivial wrapper around string-match.