From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23574: 24.5; Overzealous underlining in emacs-nox Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 07:42:37 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83porxwg1f.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1nxudrb.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpm3tyvn.fsf@gnu.org> <83twh7tt83.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3cbt5l3.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1465213403 14048 80.91.229.3 (6 Jun 2016 11:43:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 11:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23574@debbugs.gnu.org, John Mastro , cwoodbury@azavea.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 06 13:43:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b9sw5-0002sp-KW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 13:43:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41478 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9sw4-00085P-Mb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 07:43:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41702) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9svy-000840-3y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 07:43:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9svu-00072g-0f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 07:43:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43887) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9svt-00072a-Tu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 07:43:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9svt-0001xc-Mi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 07:43:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 11:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23574 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23574-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23574.14652133687503 (code B ref 23574); Mon, 06 Jun 2016 11:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23574) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2016 11:42:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56222 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9svf-0001wx-Nv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 07:42:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-f68.google.com ([209.85.218.68]:33812) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9svb-0001wh-Of for 23574@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 07:42:46 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f68.google.com with SMTP id r4so4789308oib.1 for <23574@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 04:42:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=ijYzpp9OSc6XRb0h3UzAr3IlxHW+z3X6l3p16i23mSw=; b=GH+pfdyRCThiRMvs9lm1O/U/PEJTEUlkuDaSfjPuHdJMH8IPkydZ/6IUKvMUf1b4UI +PH4lGXosw9m7VjmMd8xbau/U0iv6XNCQb3aOJJZw5laOFfe1YOyTSCkFWo4D35Hgwfy zckVyeefDO3bHTQfv+SHU9u6zlBbspxJUX5FARrBkyxb23Asv/9/LYMZkBw4IGEU43kb Rn4ZI1uxOF6O9D8zXSQhgnhJCb2fw3BaE+BXz5IvorcQdgVYkYqKFkmGVh4q1ll3DMdJ FWizxhl5QeEGePQYZOUMikG5IsamTuUR4R/kpBXYnF4d7ZB5/jLLxeA3CguHibooFm06 8E3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ijYzpp9OSc6XRb0h3UzAr3IlxHW+z3X6l3p16i23mSw=; b=Td4FplERWoYYViBDaerGb5Un/WiTjt5fZ+blIHnokAaZYDxSKTyqHB4dd1F68j3e8r 4Az9zWR6Vgmwq3LWxp8/rVjC1CasMrgEn0ozz+l7IduZmffM/usEDf2OE7WPlWvIXP5U 2qxrCsq/g5yInXlSvpnu4xKbtqigm2fSjRvMazV8H8o8wK4RwJ/pv7xh3PXvHeLs3TUc uv0vPAUVvWj0it8yvQX9Qggxiw/EK3b3R12oBiDIzyU5bqf9I1JK/fBdwTSoJ233ugAn i8xJUaXAjS90o2pTBSaPTfnjWkWdOGY6dD1DRX924ezYEJbwanQiIAyikbNNFcBg/fe3 z5tA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIz5lGiGu3VJhqTmnP24sM0jHyGSjDzQ78Kpgug0QUihWqOnnEBwqqmD6EL9rHSauwXntJhFoi8Ni/qjg== X-Received: by 10.157.1.11 with SMTP id 11mr8791465otu.17.1465213358098; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 04:42:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.157.5.168 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 04:42:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83r3cbt5l3.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: kmR8_Bg1BQFL1EMRn0psiW3-Lxo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:119143 Archived-At: tag 23574 + notabug quit On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> That doesn't seem to be the case, with the following modification to >> the recipe so that the newline characters are not underlined, the >> underlining does not continue to the edge of the screen: > > When the newline does not have the underline attribute, the underline > is not contiguous, so you are radically changing the use case. Yes. However, I believe that this is what the original ensime code intended to do; it only underlines the newlines themselves because it's easier to make 1 overlay for all the lines at once and the programmer didn't notice it was wrong because it happens to give the desired effect in GUI mode. Regardless, by experimentation I find that the space at the edge of the screen takes the face from the final newline, not the last displayed glyph character in the line. Is this documented anywhere?