From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27816: 26.0.50; X protocol error: BadPixmap (invalid Pixmap parameter) on protocol request 55 Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2017 11:47:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83zibn3gei.fsf@gnu.org> <20170802161229.GA28199@protected.rcdrun.com> <838tj1ztum.fsf@gnu.org> <20170802193158.GB30834@protected.rcdrun.com> <833799z61h.fsf@gnu.org> <5982E700.5010006@gmx.at> <83wp6ky5xn.fsf@gnu.org> <5984362B.3030205@gmx.at> <838tizy84b.fsf@gnu.org> <5985BE14.5070207@gmx.at> <20170805175658.GB1296@protected.rcdrun.com> <87h8xl6ejs.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <59ABD61B.6090007@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1504453741 7541 195.159.176.226 (3 Sep 2017 15:49:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2017 15:49:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 27816@debbugs.gnu.org, Jean Louis To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 03 17:48:46 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1doX8b-00013X-AV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2017 17:48:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54883 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1doX8i-0000ik-CL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2017 11:48:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57530) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1doX82-0000Pv-Un for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2017 11:48:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1doX7y-0001O7-9c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2017 11:48:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1doX7y-0001Nq-5z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2017 11:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1doX7x-0000EQ-So for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2017 11:48:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 15:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27816 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27816-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27816.1504453649850 (code B ref 27816); Sun, 03 Sep 2017 15:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27816) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2017 15:47:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46579 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1doX7Q-0000De-Pq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2017 11:47:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-f48.google.com ([209.85.218.48]:34048) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1doX7P-0000DR-17 for 27816@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2017 11:47:27 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f48.google.com with SMTP id w10so30093402oie.1 for <27816@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Sep 2017 08:47:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=MBjQJvb13GKKbm9stqTFWrxi92v0oVogLQlLM04Di6s=; b=eyGlRJ6LnUGA3AOMmNs/uh1I6LRGNW8goS+4q1wnsiOH+Atuk7A9BpS37RwoFqCVZN 2srDwlaAQOT5vO0gLe05C3xw28DbiGI0Cot0tBLbQ/isBvyOv1XwaKoKogkRlaYSNJ1+ uenD4jdo15+hmqk2ysmMab0UgiqiolwAFJxk/Jy2g+zjWrujpZuJ5MzJiEM4kua8Gyky eJeb6wZP9aMh4sEu9LBrRy4CLRgehH1qGTOru+QNLYSQmNof4bXLMrWyEQt2nBmabnxK Efg2Z5DKxwnQ6e8EMoQt9c1ItLRbpWyxtFPibkU4tPJcoT/lKtKaRp/cEIrHJQs46LXA VnUA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MBjQJvb13GKKbm9stqTFWrxi92v0oVogLQlLM04Di6s=; b=Sbrc1JIR0CioAJ7V0IVRP0Ji1/hAlhzXtndusYOurDgfBzK8wcf0qVxWDF7JkYtFqo V/fiIRyCPmb2SyQmByHemRkX76/frdEHC1KkrwxOdrPRdP9ixzCOkFPirT/5gtF+9WRL xjRp1f/QRrV7lx9khqQ80QcKd9s0GsEsb/1g4YEbcS6mOwNqy8/p+FxgdVQabPLy6c3V X1u63Q54bNSwZ069Ruxn/wYdN8Ma55lYepC2XcAQxr+fxB36OoV6afdbx+y9AoTXmfBt 7FCAcnS35x1x+SpJwx5r/Q4Ho4+Nfzg9nqO0tEjWN5ScNsbPXCh6BpNgAUmYbj504y3X a6fw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUgQxAIXHzYaS+/j7JAz7OWZprPFjX972n0yJImyCfXbFO2tttjl GhD6fBgUi6RkMNPUiALc4vjhDkQB+Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb6tnBryQTyDmsOSebZ3k42I1ijjp9p2nqKXL7K+tRTLFNesXiQy3ZQcRlVBfDQB4iQrQq8V3W4Pf4IAQM1t7GU= X-Received: by 10.202.117.78 with SMTP id q75mr6576993oic.247.1504453641209; Sun, 03 Sep 2017 08:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.74.17.199 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 08:47:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <59ABD61B.6090007@gmx.at> X-Google-Sender-Auth: mCiaVjhFaIUrqFtpa2IJBqLA9zg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:136544 Archived-At: On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 6:14 AM, martin rudalics wrote: >> What seems to work is this: >> >> emacs -Q -nw --eval '(setq x-command-line-resources >> "emacs.synchronous: true")' >> > > You're probably right here. But note that the OP of Bug#23499 did do that > under GDB as > > run -Q -nw -xrm "emacs.synchronous: true" -f server-start > > and did not get any XSync()s either. In either case some advice on how > to debug the client under X would useful. I'm still completely ignorant > in this department. >From what I could tell, the '-xrm' option is ignored when '-nw' is used, which is why I used '--eval' instead.