From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jorgen =?UTF-8?Q?Sch=C3=A4fer?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21666: Bug is indeed undo-list and GC related Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 15:21:45 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87y4f9dhlh.fsf@loki.jorgenschaefer.de> <83mvq7ptrj.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114195141dcf4e052d9f424a X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457537013 5433 80.91.229.3 (9 Mar 2016 15:23:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 15:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21666@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 09 16:23:24 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1adfxI-0003B4-TW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:23:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42084 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adfxD-0004UD-AE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:23:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52771) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adfx3-0004Sr-4Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:23:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adfwz-0000fh-Sq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:23:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adfwz-0000fa-QS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:23:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1adfwz-0008SI-K9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:23:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jorgen =?UTF-8?Q?Sch=C3=A4fer?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 15:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21666 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21666-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21666.145753692332431 (code B ref 21666); Wed, 09 Mar 2016 15:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21666) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2016 15:22:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41671 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1adfw3-0008R1-9m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:22:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:36357) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1adfw1-0008QX-Fl for 21666@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:22:01 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id n186so183821966wmn.1 for <21666@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 07:22:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1OUtZLgpLi/RBpKbLQLaokuOZBuWPXt9+L2cPMtJWPE=; b=eLdfRXMc9d6Lr8tcNLAcr4ZO+9OTV18E1wR1FJ3sBSkjsh2n0imEUwxgmwM02UNF/Q 2e3HL5rGcw0PAp4J2AYezvuV2AU2DMJLQZvr5R0pvDhlCENMZOwLNRjH45ulRVuZcBo5 VnP9RmRD23zeHrE5L5nz45TF1nW5vtibnT6BXGIdpsbLMQCB5Tgasr+r+a8v2b4pi/5s DixDUcktFRIIjLYAxSA66pDwbjrQOmgKGBGolZ69lUo4dg0gszbzbwSTQPmQ2aPRbt9e 8KbSxZj4bbShqVmtHGucXVBhackbvBOnmtPkpsFdShcphoY8iYqwHSq3I5hfwpJZ10kj SrRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1OUtZLgpLi/RBpKbLQLaokuOZBuWPXt9+L2cPMtJWPE=; b=dkkTwcB8PHXkdEHzyCerOBOittcNouTxkeLTcDshnrcKI2VAIUNm3M88QQFMb+iZN6 k6YiNztSc3VtstI/GANEudvJo7Q8FsK447c3G/l5hk4hNzAIYHldyDSCcOlzO/3vhznT mAQmahIwGdly+DpfVCzTXordvlNm3nuySVwgSWoaAVhG/FDQxYD7PgY150T77qrehYhk KSmqvYHWdHZa1ZOkG6SIcrMUjLgoDyJgkUYi+g4K1nY1KaFXD9klUl89KJn6vgGr4DQ3 UaJlEuiHOmROdwkoI0xcRl1hndMrd0HBwjNjGht/cB2O4pIle08fjrwMe87YZPOG38OT wRdg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLaCjOJRHpp5aJGmebquvMyMUz9VOvvK2ZyDgLvnKo2t4agsp+I4qA9NvZLWmR7c+XLsqLr6Yuf0DqlwA== X-Received: by 10.25.80.1 with SMTP id e1mr9423763lfb.165.1457536915851; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 07:21:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83mvq7ptrj.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:114640 Archived-At: --001a114195141dcf4e052d9f424a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No, I can not. As mentioned, the problem occurs after a day or two of usage. If you understand the problem better now that you know what prevents it, I am of course happy to run test cases. Eli Zaretskii schrieb am Mi., 9. M=C3=A4rz 2016 16:15: > > From: Jorgen Sch=C3=A4fer > > Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:14:35 +0000 > > > > I do not know how GC works in Emacs Lisp, but it seems to me that an > Emacs Lisp program should not be > > able to segfault Emacs in this manner. It is interesting that this > problem was introduced sometime after > > 19efb9 =E2=80=93 an Emacs built from that commit did not exhibit the pr= oblem. > > Can you bisect it more narrowly? "After 19efb9" leaves a lot of > alternatives... > > Thanks. > --001a114195141dcf4e052d9f424a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

No, I can not. As mentioned, the problem occurs after a day = or two of usage. If you understand the problem better now that you know wha= t prevents it, I am of course happy to run test cases.


Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> schrieb am Mi., 9. M=C3=A4rz = 2016 16:15:
> From: Jorgen Sch= =C3=A4fer <jorgen.schaefer@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:14:35 +0000
>
> I do not know how GC works in Emacs Lisp, but it seems to me that an E= macs Lisp program should not be
> able to segfault Emacs in this manner. It is interesting that this pro= blem was introduced sometime after
> 19efb9 =E2=80=93 an Emacs built from that commit did not exhibit the p= roblem.

Can you bisect it more narrowly?=C2=A0 "After 19efb9" leaves a lo= t of
alternatives...

Thanks.
--001a114195141dcf4e052d9f424a--