I've provided a minimal test text, written in Emacs (Test.text) and its
display for Gedit (Gedit_display.png) and Emacs (Emacs_display.png). The
Gedit display is the correct one.

Best Regards,




On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 9:00 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: Nima Aryan <nimawebgard@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 19:31:16 +0000
> >
> > The problem is specific (as it could be tested) to non-English Alphabet.
> At least Persian.
> >
> > I've tested the 'glyphless-char-display-control' and I can confirm that
> as It seems, it's working on English input
> > as expected. For example choosing to set `Hex box` cause ZWNJ be
> replaced as hex box. Other options
> > (including defaults) seems to works as expected.
> >
> > But the same option (on the same session) does not work as expected for
> Persian (and possibly other
> > similar) alphabets.
>
> Ah, that changes everything.  When Emacs displays the Persian script,
> it composes the ZWNJ character with surrounding characters to provide
> correct shaping.  The rules for this character composition are in
> lisp/language/misc-lang.el, near the end.  I don't read Persian, but
> if the resulting shaping is incorrect, please show specific examples
> with characters from the Persian script, and please show screenshots
> of their correct display (in some other application) vs what Emacs
> produces on your system.  Then we can investigate what could possibly
> be wrong with the Emacs display.
>
> > p.s. Just as a hypothesis, BiDi most interfere here as well and causes
> such behavior.
>
> I'm not sure this is the reason, but I need a clear example to
> investigate.
>
> Thanks.
>

   -