> Apparently Arm has taken the stance that signing such a disclaimer could "open a legal door which could expose intellectual property in the future". May be narrowing to very specific area (emacs, gdb-mi, no-arm-specific) would help? On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 6:06 PM Gustaf Waldemarson < gustaf.waldemarson@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm afraid I have some bad news regarding the patches. As I was > looking for someone internally at Arm to sign the employer disclaimer > I was stopped by the legal department. Apparently Arm has taken the > stance that signing such a disclaimer could "open a legal door which > could expose intellectual property in the future". Thus, I'm afraid no > one at Arm will sign such a disclaimer at this time and consequently, > these patches cannot be used in Emacs. > > I'm not exactly a lawyer, but I believe the patches can still be used > as a reference for implementing the feature, but as I mentioned I'm > afraid they cannot be used as-is. > > Sorry about the trouble, I didn't really expect the company to stop > something like this. > > > Den lör 23 feb. 2019 kl 11:37 skrev Eli Zaretskii : > > > > > From: Gustaf Waldemarson > > > Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:01:53 +0100 > > > Cc: 34589@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > > > Anytime! And I'm fine with signing away the copyright, so feel free to > > > get the paperwork rolling :) > > > > Form sent off-list. > > > > -- Andrew W. Nosenko