From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 21:05:58 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <87wn2modrm.fsf@posteo.net> <87ile6o2ov.fsf@posteo.net> <87y1mz38rl.fsf@posteo.net> <87ile2n0kn.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c7745a05f9150550" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30231"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, Philip Kaludercic , Eli Zaretskii To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 11 22:07:21 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pmKGu-0007d0-Cd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 22:07:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmKGe-0000oO-Bm; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:07:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmKGd-0000oA-3Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmKGc-0007yk-EQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:07:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmKGb-0008Om-Mr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:07:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 20:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.168124358032205 (code B ref 62720); Tue, 11 Apr 2023 20:07:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2023 20:06:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38346 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmKFw-0008NM-44 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:06:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi1-f178.google.com ([209.85.167.178]:37831) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmKFr-0008N0-PC for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:06:18 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi1-f178.google.com with SMTP id bm45so564473oib.4 for <62720@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 13:06:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1681243570; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=59hoB098uDhso++qJfaQXLWonZbB+911XOC9/46M08I=; b=D9vu232JVGORLTvJMSOhPtnTyxFKAeFaiHykOdbKL8AayOTxgcMnbgf6gXEr/AIBoh DGnDcdHzr4pxHreUhx4g5cfqUru6ylpvUyB8Fo8HluhuJsbQ6ZqdnsEykSmARuT3KzQe /uzVC/EMGuLjXOkAnDjku27PjF1AVpXlWwJBjqiLp1CtyGOfKzEviXaf9N1f1ZOFN+TT tG7t8uhJgLATFZaVMkXIyvtUNuOyAl9+p49gpbvPsHxQ96q5JnphbAF+Rd9HZBZdqWm+ biKe+3S8j5LpprDgek69D1YPNdiqD7nFLx4GiZ2Vyft/nbEF+TjDwzK1+otYvvrAOHLe 23jg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681243570; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=59hoB098uDhso++qJfaQXLWonZbB+911XOC9/46M08I=; b=B1L7l9T+ioXIIj0l0Eqrj5Uo5aqOAT4KeIFLchXgjzXBC3c+Xg/AO48jENzdIYHTrz 4sWboo4hGDb4zPOL/3FJJomVXB0itfE26ZjKv6UTwvEatoLqE2z/XLpPHINsWxu3Lrzg 8/rGC9jp+p+QrtIenxIba+xK9XXZ0qtmu9LIgZ7520TOGAAyeAj6s2wRXgKfm+u/7n5R HGYtje0FP4MxprjAe/cEmSiCgTX6lQfsvi5qmjRWOWkv1Kvk4saF+Gdb4wNZ9LVkoFXk zGGkZA3ShrQxS80cXrd8HbfGDVnAFcKz1FrJtGMegctfjWdDCBjXpN/kv7q6cP1o8eht R+ag== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9cfEgpvfggVlz73SShMdV/KkVDYS03bxMS5eXo5U2XH2r+vwHdB n+k0Fg1ZmSf0sBRHOEyCVHI26n/5ema/LzCSw8E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350baJMvIJsZTCUbfkncVsZHkbZNccWK6Cy0FrkZaYrXJ5Q53F9QDanZWveQn/Urpvrv6eakJ09eWa/o4ef9tbvs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:2195:b0:386:a109:57c8 with SMTP id be21-20020a056808219500b00386a10957c8mr3764108oib.5.1681243570138; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 13:06:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259675 Archived-At: --000000000000c7745a05f9150550 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 11, 2023, 20:44 Stefan Monnier wrote= : > > Thanks. I've just tested 'M-x package-update-all' with my patch. It > > updates the built-in and the manually installed packages that can be > > updated. It _doesn't_ install any packages that weren't installed yet, > > of course. > > Hmm... it might make sense to treat builtins specially in this respect. > Of course, maybe it's OK, but for some reason I feel a bit uncomfortable > with the idea that `M-x package-update-all` would update all the > `:core` packages. > > I'm not sure why, admittedly, but I think it comes down to the fact that > the first upgrade of a `:core` package from GNU ELPA feels to me more > like an "install" than an "upgrade". Can't argue against feelings :) Jo=C3=A3o > > --000000000000c7745a05f9150550 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023, 20:44 Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> Thanks.=C2=A0 I've just tested &= #39;M-x package-update-all' with my patch.=C2=A0 It
> updates the built-in and the manually installed packages that can be > updated.=C2=A0 It _doesn't_ install any packages that weren't = installed yet,
> of course.

Hmm... it might make sense to treat builtins specially in this respect.
Of course, maybe it's OK, but for some reason I feel a bit uncomfortabl= e
with the idea that `M-x package-update-all` would update all the
`:core` packages.

I'm not sure why, admittedly, but I think it comes down to the fact tha= t
the first upgrade of a `:core` package from GNU ELPA feels to me more
like an "install" than an "upgrade".
=

Can't argue against= feelings :)

Jo=C3=A3o

--000000000000c7745a05f9150550--