From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:56:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <83y1mue1qi.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfd2e01f.fsf@gnu.org> <1a5e5837-513b-84d8-3260-cdbf42b71267@gutov.dev> <83sfcz9rf2.fsf@gnu.org> <09a49ab9-ac72-36a9-3e68-9c633710eba7@gutov.dev> <83r0sh8i1q.fsf@gnu.org> <35638c9d-e13f-fad8-5f95-ea03d65d4aa2@gmail.com> <87a5z3izst.fsf@web.de> <83v8hr7qk9.fsf@gnu.org> <83pm7z7nkc.fsf@gnu.org> <4b63ef62-5e1c-3dcf-ec7b-06b69e79133b@gutov.dev> <83o7nj7mfn.fsf@gnu.org> <556e0fbb-215e-c11d-0e8b-73e97441abbb@gutov.dev> <83pm7y6fdo.fsf@gnu.org> <47140c27-ba63-ca7b-8b9e-cc38a6f9a866@gutov.dev> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5218"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jporterbugs@gmail.com, philipk@posteo.net, 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, Eli Zaretskii , larsi@gnus.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 20 15:57:37 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ppUn2-00015a-BQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 15:57:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ppUms-0000GH-7R; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 09:57:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ppUmU-0008Qf-Rq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 09:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ppUmU-0005LV-Iw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 09:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ppUmU-000094-1s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 09:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 13:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.1681998983530 (code B ref 62720); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 13:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Apr 2023 13:56:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38426 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ppUlr-00008U-Ea for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 09:56:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi1-f179.google.com ([209.85.167.179]:53704) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ppUlp-00008N-8X for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 09:56:21 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi1-f179.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-38e0a003abdso446350b6e.3 for <62720@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 06:56:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1681998975; x=1684590975; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Tj24JHCP+VJXO2vRffGYcuxjVdowG8JAXEyz6wWCkU0=; b=XsVEUdZFJJrGXucMJtYrfYS1e+h4fr5ILRq5inUeZP93ykzACo7BAzyfCmHAO3llEZ Nd4nzP6YoJE+MP7aPsRDo/tDLoJzeYZdPDWerW8m373tX14zZoOWbmHPJXLcNRCLb49Y T2gzUSaV9jV19/WwhKsbjNMsGwaGp8N3iS89VN3qyci54HErzsfV3/5y2sGyURbK1TWS PRVHzSfs7z1t3y6tXftWyefNeGunnYphB58JqJ8F19VfYG5KgvProTcCOlhX1cu7uG6S aGFEX3neFY6NRJRa0uNH3oaXM6LDWv12BwimPbEstpT+/vveK6QGYzUlbQHHesjgP9b5 FT8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1681998975; x=1684590975; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Tj24JHCP+VJXO2vRffGYcuxjVdowG8JAXEyz6wWCkU0=; b=QcAaeXGb1NAML3p9dAv04nhg64ZMNa6qUfYcUWv76h15GZdK75Xc/WCirP4PAbZFo0 zCqLecjazpX9jLz4zo1yXoo/jEKJeyAelW7GaU5D6zqd7AO1mgbk6b17m8rT04GnlZBD IysFZH4BydI78fwQu9dpV85LOxRU2pMiDAXwYEpLGfFXTSoURik4H/lidVJqKTzjAfCh 7s97ak9at+S+z6WwQGTFDcMRyCVhkvkCDBc9jyEiCBxL/Jdpjx6R6aptQFcmnW6flxah e90TPPEBeLbmiAlE4puI3vkR4tL7ftkr1Kl//maAFbHzyzYmmvmJULam1uLF1P6DwJKc MA2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9d2+bSUj0DFC0KhdCIQE4EuTNf94QaOpc4UqLIic5tA+NesSiBS QmfbScxlaMe4DByAOomTsWMh9301fTR4IFTF+uE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZvGdkefcCWobpIpMwXdi4wAfyPWW7jJxwVTvZLyo/kF119fDAyJBO+9cLD35Bbu2cjE+59oQOuX7szZwpF/Js= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:f03:b0:38d:ef77:d720 with SMTP id m3-20020a0568080f0300b0038def77d720mr1012101oiw.52.1681998975311; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 06:56:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <47140c27-ba63-ca7b-8b9e-cc38a6f9a866@gutov.dev> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:260334 Archived-At: On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 2:39=E2=80=AFPM Dmitry Gutov wro= te: > The reasons for me to be less hopeful: > > - We seem to be unable to come to any agreement here. :-D > > Joao's approval for the above list would go a long way. First of all, thank you Dmitry for making such an extensive and detailed summary of the simualtion. It's really impressive. What you say about a fixed package-update obviating the need for eglot-update is totally true. In fact I proposed a fixed package-update much much earlier in this thread. If you manage to do that, then I'm more than happy to remove eglot-update. What more approval do you want? :-) I mean, I've resigned myself to a bad situation already (but if you can make package-install DTRT, I'm of course even happier). So package-update or eglot-update -- anything that I can put on the README . Jo=C3=A3o