From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59082: 28.2; Undocumented `intern-soft` feature with shorthands symbols Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 17:18:57 +0000 Message-ID: References: <875yfresq9.fsf@posteo.net> <831qq8ny2m.fsf@gnu.org> <87leog4018.fsf@posteo.net> <83o7tcm7ji.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004f953105ed493486" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3352"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: thievol@posteo.net, 59082@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 12 18:20:18 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1otuB0-0000hh-5H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 18:20:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1otuAl-0003FQ-UN; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 12:20:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1otuAl-0003FI-25 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 12:20:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1otuAk-0008PU-NI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 12:20:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1otuAj-0007vE-Uz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 12:20:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 17:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59082 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59082-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59082.166827355730393 (code B ref 59082); Sat, 12 Nov 2022 17:20:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59082) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Nov 2022 17:19:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48904 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1otuA1-0007u8-8N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 12:19:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-oi1-f179.google.com ([209.85.167.179]:33491) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1otu9z-0007tw-9g for 59082@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 12:19:15 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-oi1-f179.google.com with SMTP id c129so7736667oia.0 for <59082@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 09:19:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=27LoRvMHskgNkJTuEfBn/JJKtFylOuf5yggZbaSffuc=; b=UTtkPEpCd4MYsmYTB3qHLeHPZ/uRdNRd9G8ap6eqlPBFSaczZRQ5z2bAd1PB7ROOt0 Jw4pL1BdVsd6Us5O4NvoZqk5WWxYkRGGUKeRRb2408IVN8mRYctTR/C+vXMr0VoGRmRc WXRvT7sgJpcnyXdhtrR6VziaTBKV6A3+Xd9pWLliOJdl2lrsvxKxhMDm9ngQPM1upTWU ivCLKUF6wjW3ztfi+6LZf5LCL0aFT4sBqNib1qv+VZqEnVCGeurSCajvCjYBk+y9Okqa 0e+gnj5+7/VkoNsoM2XbAnagXk5Rk5sScAC80wdapYwrOMSEQkQM0/qRtAHnYtWOhMaI 5Gig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=27LoRvMHskgNkJTuEfBn/JJKtFylOuf5yggZbaSffuc=; b=Z5C+LWFUjmMGODAfAZ1YPq0IIV0jSw1ttLE/dxLIbaJrImelihlJFxmXH3ncj0xJhN +dHA24zDE0DgeA0VbLNsGWjUhqR1MloQuLtw4u29nH5kI6/FReB3J0Zt49QD5yvmbhc/ kfLrhBJFyxs8CfaDjdt84Q4OpDxE3YbewA/QHCkYPdNigdCyva/lYBBPBxAC5CO+KhMp GkuDkD65Ks2hXSB7nCubEoqB03i8XJeDTbOZn5ujdVBBcfP9DcJV+ILjkJp3NZxj/CwH Sxe3RlURNFmXsALQXmhf8v7+xvRnL5tS97gGGd5Pvo4IsEKWzutoCnNqeLNUjAPf4fEP RnjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pl9mnVM/ILHLSUYQeRmF2El7K0so0gYFozSO5hZB25Umn3Cd6pl KR1hBIrL9nc7xqj3XRALt7b/0qyDqutMsaxdYi8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6ira8tyUxjJR/0/upXAhnNLwwXZ4pnec1SuuWk4hkstL41PlXj7pkr5kN5pelHw5nQYX+UDaIxh6ZADT1oAKI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:13c4:b0:35a:7e8d:8ad6 with SMTP id d4-20020a05680813c400b0035a7e8d8ad6mr3011457oiw.171.1668273549578; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 09:19:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83o7tcm7ji.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:247671 Archived-At: --0000000000004f953105ed493486 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Of course. And for blue the programmer should just use the names of the symbols there, as always. Shorthands are not the names of symbols, as i keep reminding. If the docstring reader is ever enhanced, then maybe programmers can refer to symbols there using shorthands. Until then, shorthands are Lisp-only. On Sat, Nov 12, 2022, 17:01 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora > > Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 16:46:51 +0000 > > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 59082@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Hmm, not sure we should be using shorthands in docstrings, which aren't > read by the Lisp reader, but by > > something else... This is what is at stake, right? > > References to functions and variables in doc strings are a matter of > routine. > --0000000000004f953105ed493486 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Of course. And for blue the programmer should just use th= e names of the symbols there, as always. Shorthands are not the names of sy= mbols, as i keep reminding.

If= the docstring reader is ever enhanced, then maybe programmers can refer to= symbols there using shorthands. Until then, shorthands are Lisp-only.

On Sat, Nov 12, 2022, 17:01 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> From: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora <joaotavora@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 16:46:51 +0000
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, 59082@d= ebbugs.gnu.org
>
> Hmm, not sure we should be using shorthands in docstrings, which aren&= #39;t read by the Lisp reader, but by
> something else... This is what is at stake, right?

References to functions and variables in doc strings are a matter of
routine.
--0000000000004f953105ed493486--