From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61312: Patch for eglot: scala LSP binary name Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 18:45:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: <-edmUJ29wZgHuAqckk1IXW8s3dBmAtrNRbO2nUbic7v2H38NPWS7HJIPpdeI1A-zvKlqRJ7LegKJ8HLszMHggEcWkVBu_z72mfmMBH3TwNg=@proton.me> <83ttzypzjk.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000acc69105f40c7011" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16576"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 61312@debbugs.gnu.org, skykanin To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 06 19:46:26 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pP6VV-00048B-Q1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 19:46:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pP6VQ-0002XI-ED; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 13:46:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pP6VB-0002We-0x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 13:46:11 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pP6V8-0004ID-H2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 13:46:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pP6V8-0000oT-Ct for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 13:46:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 18:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61312 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61312-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61312.16757091583110 (code B ref 61312); Mon, 06 Feb 2023 18:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61312) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2023 18:45:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49933 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pP6V4-0000o6-09 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 13:45:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-oa1-f48.google.com ([209.85.160.48]:42911) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pP6V2-0000nr-JR for 61312@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 13:45:56 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-oa1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-142b72a728fso16233971fac.9 for <61312@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 10:45:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TQMUhhLURTJ1NObAdE6yGTuashbHjJP05+7qP9zGfKY=; b=JX5PnmSaUWNuCAQ/Dq4J0y1LaAPsGYAj6NuMYccAiRMgHVgf2//BedeVTfGIcX22Ie yzt1CipM0yRKqcPJX0D0dKSGR+6Zs3s+JHRgw2xyOINNZdS1OrbYC/3a/A3RQtuCzmjL AjjBPJRtfThc/62vUB3KFwPNCcOlUcGcPlkfiCvGidA5jyju5AuQYpHcwWsdL7JpVcKm AeAwxywzXMFnfAOlIPDGSt/QegEKwRq5sU7TyGbY3k0e9VFz+AORh51/Q99Tz0rEfbQY G2s8Eqyqbv+P3zzLn0c/AwzG+RMiSJzEH5KHv2wiICS1yz2VmJqmwn/yWAPFDXTp90j9 BGQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=TQMUhhLURTJ1NObAdE6yGTuashbHjJP05+7qP9zGfKY=; b=7vH2ivlxis4JltcsdE072+G0WH5A1G4PFnTaI1L34xh/BZpk3vdipaxyIpLkzR6IKN awhl8oGM1mf10huVbSDkj/+NxdmHS2+cGdp/Lwxby7PXcVaN9KmV4JvNhISKNuJRU/2W xumGWUUwlSwCwXNUntRL+8Ayd8yGN73FDGX3vgT162PlbLCyblRC/4raGcAhNmc7LCkZ ivYCDIyVTyoUtkw/ONqPDaI0lPMAjGE7jcPLCv8HZKUGN0lD9jE13KiVQ7GSb7O72wom 9GVmR+cIjZdvRHVBMbbEQOrzzjsrLJHuV0VPZm5nmJhCmA2Bx/sCF/n/O2/nAbOUfuqI 52cA== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWsEQAdVmcaWyH5JeB/oU6ntU1QExdfkolnwo/9XT7w+sU9l35M TwOh3Bwf/VYc2LOSDA8rFgvqV5npa4RUkQdF8gA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9Tx6hJHJonI834Eb3sVq5PSToKdD3Vt31RjmnTEnpupVUZQVsYH7qcvoiTk5eXVrA3A1ZNyYl5A1Aqgq7a2o8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:6390:b0:169:f796:4aea with SMTP id t16-20020a056870639000b00169f7964aeamr1029143oap.171.1675709150708; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 10:45:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83ttzypzjk.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:254998 Archived-At: --000000000000acc69105f40c7011 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Eli, As usual, I defer this decision to you. I think it's reasonable to support both names, and I also think it's reasonable to stick to just the one we think is most used or representative of the program. In this case, I think "metals-emacs" is a contradiction of LSP's stated goal, which is to have editor-agnostic servers. But I don't know what the reasons were for doing this, I haven't investigated. It would be even more reasonable, I think, if distributions settled -- or mostly settled - on names for their binaries they distribute, much like *nix toolchains do. Of course we do not control that process, but maybe we could influence it instead of being constantly influenced by it. Jo=C3=A3o --000000000000acc69105f40c7011 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi, Eli,

As usual, I defer t= his decision to you. I think it's reasonable to
support both = names, and I also think it's reasonable=C2=A0to stick to=C2=A0
just the one we think is most used or representative of the=C2=A0
program.

In this case, I think "metals-ema= cs" is a contradiction of LSP's
stated goal, which is to= have editor-agnostic servers. But I=C2=A0
don't know what th= e reasons were for doing this, I haven't
investigated.
<= div>
It would be even more reasonable, I think, if distributi= ons=C2=A0
settled -- or mostly settled - on names for their binar= ies they=C2=A0
distribute, much like *nix toolchains do. Of cours= e we do not=C2=A0
control that process, but maybe we could influe= nce it instead
of being constantly influenced by it.
Jo=C3=A3o
--000000000000acc69105f40c7011--