From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 12:15:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <87wn2modrm.fsf@posteo.net> <87ile6o2ov.fsf@posteo.net> <87y1mz38rl.fsf@posteo.net> <87ile2n0kn.fsf@gmail.com> <83v8i2abqi.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2ilgx7.fsf@gmail.com> <83a5ze9uc1.fsf@gnu.org> <831qkq9rpy.fsf@gnu.org> <83pm898xb9.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6tlleg0.fsf@gmail.com> <8335558qc7.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfd5761f.fsf@gnu.org> <87zg7djrgr.fsf@gmail.com> <83o7nt73za.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4525"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, philipk@posteo.net, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 12 13:16:13 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pmYSS-0000zO-HC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:16:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmYSJ-0005Hi-AR; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:16:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmYSI-0005HW-BL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmYSI-0004xO-0X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmYSH-0002wJ-RZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:16:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.168129813011256 (code B ref 62720); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2023 11:15:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39200 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmYRm-0002vT-8t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:15:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oa1-f52.google.com ([209.85.160.52]:34372) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmYRk-0002vF-JF for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:15:29 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oa1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-1842cddca49so13514932fac.1 for <62720@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 04:15:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1681298123; x=1683890123; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=fMpN7fGXVYQY9YrrBJksZYhuFN0lvvLxq6TR8aS/Ag8=; b=luxOaXUON8zykkao21j9RVkr11Fljg/IBqKZaHze8/eBdjS7v2KYZFNlqXKmMns569 /ZEMIU4NxAnL8Wdd940ciH7Q+DJEhTG2vYQZEuZDDE7EYnNX1zxrbHsMMGOLrXGS134A zoM7BDjhUC4VtbfIu/0LVZFbxVlWCP0YQdy2oBWfR2EwLurUSIKlpjAtaIzighahmLc/ 0gbfv9IPjRnHMP8oHgRNRwQApKriU/9xOdJoQWEvPy01VYatHfVVBDBZPW53pS7N4hrx rwezbSmOg4oGdbsiYIuiWon8WXybIWNLpwi3eESqzQ0ZpK4VOMsCFzykQKuzBOKWl0gz O8hw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681298123; x=1683890123; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fMpN7fGXVYQY9YrrBJksZYhuFN0lvvLxq6TR8aS/Ag8=; b=ByRhi3OBAgkFFMiRf28La0uF54lXb4X181BzHU/Egf9DSftKCGCzCoC6qX3GIIB+FU D41IwGLuuvH1TJSrSXmTbmCazt2PYraULcGp/X314uWfhg0PfilKKgKW6goFp04zn3Ec VUXuNGfWRZR14haq7/2bVQeBO/9HY/fg6VsMdTKZBZoPGNESlaqN1HK3rw+RhUKHZy4a /5SqOCuVrz6QzSvtOo28nQAGz68YwvwIfv8f180Ycm/ZdcpQ73IDd9Xh+crkU8WxKEez e+lZpUUnGeLZHXkBXmDfG0C7a35khxU2LI3h52mBIuBfbXdnwUBbD4ifzAv0NjtgTS5e Wseg== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9dR2b7KtOBCTJfDBrE9KTaJC4T3ZtRsIIOlnXdV5ZDzH1Q0WdWR uhPpeJowO0LigwC9Vbd1aFaq8CoqV5+Q6ZsQfXY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZaDOgXBINQRes+Cycu69bRyBiPog6s4V3YeCZvztpOhPjbXiG74W40j+c8/aaY794v4fvozoSbX+DIYWb+L9A= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:e892:b0:180:1f9f:923e with SMTP id q18-20020a056870e89200b001801f9f923emr2901165oan.5.1681298122913; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 04:15:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83o7nt73za.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259725 Archived-At: On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:07=E2=80=AFPM Eli Zaretskii wrote= : > > > From: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora > > Cc: philipk@posteo.net, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 62720@debbugs.gnu.o= rg, > > larsi@gnus.org > > Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 12:00:04 +0100 > > > > Had another idea: what about this very tiny patch, then? It makes `M-x > > package-install` work for installing a :core package. This also rhymes > > exactly with Stefan's intution/feeling that :core packages need to be > > "installed" to promote them to installable. The current M-x > > package-install recommendation could remain flawlessly and then you can > > do whatever you think is best for M-x package-update & friends. > > This has the same problem: it modifies a function that is called in > too many places. package-installed-p has half a dozen callers in > package.el alone. The change is tiny, but what about its > implications on every use case where it is involved? What about them? I volunteer to help test whichever cases you (or anyone else) think may be problematic. Can we put this tiny patch on master then? Maybe there's half a chance for a backport until the Emacs 29.1 release, or a quarter of a chance that some future Emacs 29.2 will also get it. Jo=C3=A3o