Is this really the final word on this whole topic?   The current solution involves a one

shot addition to `post-command-hook` in Eglot and is really ugly.  Can you really

 really no better solution so that Eglot is only compelled to send changes to the 

server once track-changes.el announces it safe to do so (and gives the change 

to send while it's at it?

Also, tangentially , can we get rid of the fboundp's and make the next GNU 

ELPA version run the same code as Emacs master's by depending on 

track-changes.el GNU core?

Also also, can you fix indentation in the function that you recently touched 

in Eglot? (same goes for Philip, but I'll contact him separately).

João