From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56459: 29.0.50; Edebug disables Eldoc Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 19:11:12 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87zghieol4.fsf@gmail.com> <871qurzzyv.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmibzx0k.fsf@gnu.org> <20220731195223.90596.FMU217810@trabanten-schwein.prv.splode.com> <87sfmg1bpf.fsf@gnus.org> <5dd202b1-3dfb-022a-d458-c0a13c1a2d59@yandex.ru> <83edqagcux.fsf@gnu.org> <0fc4cf3b-86af-027e-32f4-9c85e2650ae7@yandex.ru> <83ilfkfpgw.fsf@gnu.org> <83h6v4fp3z.fsf@gnu.org> <83bklcflzg.fsf@gnu.org> <834jr4fh44.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7663"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: max.brieiev@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, friedman@splode.com, 56459@debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 01 20:12:28 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pXRsJ-0001o7-BJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 20:12:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pXRrv-00053t-KT; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 14:12:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pXRru-00053S-JM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 14:12:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pXRru-00076F-4T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 14:12:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pXRrt-0005go-J6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 14:12:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2023 19:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56459 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 56459-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56459.167769789221823 (code B ref 56459); Wed, 01 Mar 2023 19:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56459) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2023 19:11:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54925 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pXRrQ-0005fu-2x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 14:11:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ot1-f42.google.com ([209.85.210.42]:36626) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pXRrM-0005fd-NJ for 56459@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 14:11:30 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ot1-f42.google.com with SMTP id p13-20020a9d744d000000b0069438f0db7eso198464otk.3 for <56459@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 11:11:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1677697883; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=mETea2NjcxBLuO2GiaJUtdkcTN8q0JvPfoSBQECST3Y=; b=dqYYzfL1Bz4ZTayUym40MChJhHfMF4KgZeViW/JAoyDxkjaOgWCz41EG+QJu8w0FpH kvCNwcKD30htpM2YwfEOnr47SM+08YHghfiG0KezMtMCchp2Q/9umrCTdsF27nTBeOKB qw+4hyI3g8w5xJbUtL52aI82ZIe4Jb7cwiERwcOPVNmaE997uC3bBSnqVaY2jCmH5CJF TC6lwjn1i14XzT0rnd/DNVZ8ksOBxzh7vnZjB98dLb15y+DSv7Tc2yQVoBcDDd8c5Q+H 73XAxSxupAkM3Oc8U9tQG0xClbwJ4aoNafesO4IK9cMh+6uEbejSS+POQcISR8kggndk IwIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1677697883; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mETea2NjcxBLuO2GiaJUtdkcTN8q0JvPfoSBQECST3Y=; b=42e2VkDsWCo27XWH8EHo8xP3qGWHmcyWt6qTASIqLSY15jag4C285+NDlvCHtABS0t Hxi8FsQEDaAN0B+2Qezb0Ic5/ZrLdl0MFQGfbIq+wsrZ1zhul4MZYzKXwlNcwi7/nElY obmP19MQkLOfxynBjmywWkYpdmdeD1iVwFZUBvdlcGr3n3GgWkaGkz85WkmjdUDQuYhZ zp9pxIiUuzIfevD/UeEwPpXNbnpISrgLBIPf2ySjEV9AA+09jfCEVz9tT2V05Qj9w3nd KYvlXBUfgLkjiagVXWbLz2Hv3RgWPlWQp5CdqdOF4aIWCcX2nADM41uQYIpLgPpMWsYM fgbg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXCjmRK7dk8+prQWk0RYRj+a+UiHFIUTa0+cIsUIx8Ns2C8f0Eg QYtN4ZOpFUWcHEFio3GCobFDyk4afe8xl/eG3+c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set881c3cWdHtI06EwcQEx7Kr4LvKc1dQy2HHUtB+xL1iiGDIRQUU3QHfVBfe0FqXz6POh3gKTXoaLkkbHAODZEY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:335c:b0:690:edcc:d7a2 with SMTP id l28-20020a056830335c00b00690edccd7a2mr2562493ott.3.1677697882948; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 11:11:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <834jr4fh44.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:257098 Archived-At: On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 6:42=E2=80=AFPM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora > > Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 18:25:04 +0000 > > Cc: Dmitry Gutov , Max Brieiev , > > Lars Ingebrigtsen , 56459@debbugs.gnu.org, friedm= an@splode.com > > > > I think there's a decent place in eldoc.el to do this check, though we = should take care not to require > > edebug.el in eldoc.el. > > > > I'll look at it later, but I think if one searches for the phrase "chec= k if we have permission to mess with the > > echo area at all", or something to that effect, one would see it. > > The condition which was misfiring is in > eldoc-display-message-no-interference-p, which is called by that > place. So the problem is not _where_ to make the test, the problem is > what should the test be to avoid overwriting Edebug evaluation results > with ElDoc stuff. I couldn't find an indication we could depend on to > distinguish stepping through Lisp from typing in the buffer popped by > 'E', for example. Every test I tried either succeeded in both cases > or failed in both cases. Sorry, I misunderstood the problem. In fact I didn't know about Edebug's E at all. Jo=C3=A3o -- Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora