From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#70036: a fix that Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:52:42 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4e670617-6483-4159-a5cf-27a921764c38@email.android.com> <87zftp28ri.fsf@thornhill.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14725"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 70036@debbugs.gnu.org, felician.nemeth@gmail.com To: Theodor Thornhill Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 19 09:54:01 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rxj4J-0003X7-D9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 09:53:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rxj4B-0006Uy-Pz; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 03:53:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rxj4A-0006Ul-Dd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 03:53:50 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rxj49-0005Ga-A4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 03:53:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rxj4N-0003nG-8B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 03:54:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 07:54:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70036 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 70036-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B70036.171351319814209 (code B ref 70036); Fri, 19 Apr 2024 07:54:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 70036) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Apr 2024 07:53:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57494 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rxj3d-0003h7-RG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 03:53:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]:51701) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rxj3b-0003gx-AH for 70036@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 03:53:15 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2dcc8d10d39so5560931fa.3 for <70036@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 00:53:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1713513175; x=1714117975; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=iC3ttA/9t+GG5lrffTrHBT7GmCppsKE7ZLKET8aGzQc=; b=Ney6xrQ0HCLTm4VMNIPP2A0vMjN2hzWyoD8wSZPryVE2Z+MJfx1WAGtXy3uC5zCpfM cLzMbSaGWCaaahAfFK94DN32rfJ6uz4W9lK7o3MUpMvc6cpV0a+mT7CYwVj8T5hyiYgd hQX949OtWP/OviRKMmpbrftLtmkTGrcTdgaOLWWvYQqrXN8M63p4GnWj6b94ApxzTY1X kUUERbrJg9TuIIMSbSyzDwT9VmVDvw3TrNj18UxYDk+Fl+Eirdva99GSLBTNkhl9zTHl p3DP/wPMTU6FsswkuypcVRuEE56SmnzNtYyJKb4cQZxEITVA8hjXOT8NNEj/ThGMUK3i wXAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713513175; x=1714117975; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iC3ttA/9t+GG5lrffTrHBT7GmCppsKE7ZLKET8aGzQc=; b=eiPh7xyQodCGkZ66Bc8pO79fivqgiAjoFiHTBkpMm+7nYUOHBdrNSJ9bctYlFDlKfO ckrXEgMjZQdhfw+f9WPP69XV5Ywb9d+BR5pE2RE+/7BdsLw+5w/bvhvlSshF2YIP+qIz nuxFTZTlQiB55jzP1Lj2ImImiVfomKedTfvAeRLc7cnwz4e0VoyJFqVZvRqlRd2h4PCp W+lu9rvyuqq1ip8M+au2JLZD5R5saSx4+X9+80PVMYlxcIS0oFjBH/4LSIU5hwz6OGDq B343v/l2kW86+mRTb2J3GZ8Buz6CRH4S+vtX4GZ9ziB6oEThNUAQGbxbmqKWQOiFOqJx j4Vg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCX8Ea11/JXN8UKHT5msGE0J3YO1L1KhRNTrqevuOSlMkU5DguoT/2aCpAp2D92VkpVvRr5eFndF6MeonWcP5t7gBk75pCE= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwDD6Ljf44dBhvP1wvUp6JaOUlr6pShNf/NGiA0LsypQyA9/nlg +k42cjGVSPCHXjE0V2F1dF8iHKb9U13c2TewidQLELn7K1OncznJ0S9R93ui6LYxWVOTXwAqZuK wO/r8/dw423V5YPpNzrWq7sdXdm0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGIANdZQ0jcp8wgM7gopF0jebnAGWBiQNKhCKtVmjY1B1zgYF3qGsvVdbCHtgsvgrBJmMeckZEhLM8ZtYf8BR4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:4d4:b0:2d8:34ad:7f4e with SMTP id e20-20020a05651c04d400b002d834ad7f4emr922558lji.4.1713513175078; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 00:52:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zftp28ri.fsf@thornhill.no> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:283646 Archived-At: On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 6:59=E2=80=AFAM Theodor Thornhill wrote: > I agree - that's why I want to focus on improving the code, same as > you. I just want you to understand that being mindful on how you come > across can't really hurt. You're right of course. I do try to be mindful, but maybe I made a mistake= . IIUC it was the part where I said this was a "one-off and uncommon" report that you felt was unkind and harsh. Because you wrote that. I absolutely think we miscommunicated: I wasn't trying to say you have a bizarre project setup, I was simply trying to make a statement about statistics and the relative importance. > There are enough conflicts around these days, In Emacs or in the world? If the former I'd rather not know about them. > let's not make code be one. Right. So reverting another person's code isn't that big of a deal. You "reverted" bits of my code when doing your commits, and that's fine. > Yeah, that's right. I assume that when json serde disappeared as a > bottleneck others emerge. This is the obvious one to me right now. When my hotspot for a given reasonable profile is 4%, I'm feeling fairly good about my code. But yes, of course, it can be addressed. > Sure. That will make the change you make similar in spirit to mine, yet > with a different implementation. I'm fine with that. With the difference that my change also still ultimately uses truename, just very frugally. So it still understands symlinks, doesn't mislead the server and doesn't expose the bug I demonstrated. Jo=C3=A3o