On Sun, Aug 30, 2020, 16:46 Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:
João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:

> Anyway, the solution with less risk here is to use
> with-supressed-warnings

Hm...  I don't think that's a good idea.  We shouldn't suppress warnings
that point to actual problems, like this one does: eldoc-message will be
going away some day, and then idle.el will stop working (without any
warning).


Not without _any warning_. I'm only supressing the obsoletion warning. If you remove a function you should in principle get another warning.

João