.
>
> If this change can't go into emacs-29, I think it's better to add
> an M-x eglot-update to eglot.el.
That's the worst of all worlds.
Why? It's the safest option. Absolutely no package.el regression possible, and doesn't solve a problem where you don't think I've exists.
Sorry, I meant to write "where you don't think one exists".
What is the problem with the two possible solutions I suggested?
They are incongruent and not very user friendly IMO.
Admittedly, eglot-update is also incongruent, of course, but at least that problem is confined to a single package.
João