From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45763: 27.1; fido-mode does not work with icomplete-in-buffer completion Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 09:18:08 +0000 Message-ID: References: <556652585.117858.1610281874781@office.mailbox.org> <87r1eswdp5.fsf@gmail.com> <86mt4zar3h.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86a60yp5o4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000090d36305f5bf13be" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17771"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 45763@debbugs.gnu.org, simon254@mailbox.org, Stefan Monnier To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 28 10:19:34 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pWw90-0004OE-B2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 10:19:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWw8l-0002q9-HS; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 04:19:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWw8U-0002pp-R3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 04:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWw8U-00088y-F9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 04:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pWw8U-0006ex-5K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 04:19:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 09:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45763 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45763-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45763.167757590725542 (code B ref 45763); Tue, 28 Feb 2023 09:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45763) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2023 09:18:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49711 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pWw7v-0006du-5p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 04:18:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-oa1-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:43928) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pWw7t-0006dh-8j for 45763@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 04:18:25 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-oa1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-172094e10e3so10220201fac.10 for <45763@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 01:18:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1677575899; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tkbB0fuVXYzLgpklibDm7Ldg5lbfw1i0+9t5qemmOtU=; b=La3N/lbpnq4oxJpNodZnJVNqWlCCmdjUDQ33H5AXthWBkxRgSQ8P6m3uihprxvAsSj 3KMvkoi/3MsFeM/EL65fxITxIk35F/N/I5tyVMN5S9WkIzfxZpoB4kKBCYORO//qWjfa eMy7aSgq/zSJTXeO38mRcQuYOGWHid/M+gAudaXoa7NDUojPp78KpDWhm2360Q473FoY OdGbdRsNzFtpzLRbje4q4Gjx+8flPczTSnpTqaYDWxNZetfTTzcfCiwiyM3AxLzvMstK 1/Hgmz5Wv398XRFGfbl6TyjrGwFbq6ZBtL2tpQtf/Lfr2li5LzQQYkaaU8+wP97aKgwj e/kg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1677575899; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=tkbB0fuVXYzLgpklibDm7Ldg5lbfw1i0+9t5qemmOtU=; b=sIaqAFH/wMkMYgTET8ZxgWxWl6wLHBoc7Da1kUTyyJISkFzCYruo/FlD1uteDZlBMu EJVFVUFfYpx0b+QLgDa2YKy+EHv0sVvPLTle/pEG4jSyxjJLSLN/GcPLpoDuMtJ3eGwq UW2PuQXT0+kIIWECG5EOn6I7BgpKAHHQ/tGiWm6we2UnSkUzVqzGFPjZgK7v6uq7LTbI q+mla9KlxDtIzFUiklOepHIaRqUidYx7hTZE3waaneeMcB9yEn/dqGyK8eN4dzvMUxfD 2JhUUjPWU9ozssrqWpB/IekQhiiuSzHmexzXPrnzgOO1698Ty3zeJKXwk6/syHZ3zw3E QuMw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUeolwyE1Sc2fvMSACatVtk2T1+48TsHF2Wr7SOj7hHg3tIeQZY PfFFTJN5nv/MXVxx2zwLup3/6R4zcKH7c5lblTc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+R/uYgs+ihujC59KhruQ8wAWNXNc30ExOW/koiuecrUlFWqAQpDkow3le7dtxF+rZy2md+bQct7fy/8hutvdA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:c7a6:b0:171:8f59:3437 with SMTP id dy38-20020a056870c7a600b001718f593437mr520800oab.8.1677575899368; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 01:18:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <86a60yp5o4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:256938 Archived-At: --00000000000090d36305f5bf13be Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I just realized the patch shown in this bug is my own, and there's no notice of what was done to fix this bug. Did you push my patch? Or something else? When I wrote it, it didn't work, according to the message. Jo=C3=A3o On Tue, Feb 28, 2023, 08:16 Juri Linkov wrote: > >> I fixed in-buffer completion in the commit a7a984c0ebe. > >> Now your patch works nicely in fido-mode, > >> so I pushed it was well, thanks. > > > > If this is effectively fixing things shouldn't it be in emacs-29? > > I could backport to the emacs-29 branch if Eli agrees. > --00000000000090d36305f5bf13be Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I just realized the patch shown in this bug is my own, an= d there's no notice of what was done to fix this bug. Did you push my p= atch? Or something else?

When = I wrote it, it didn't work, according to the message.

Jo=C3=A3o

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023, 08:1= 6 Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>= ; wrote:
>> I fixed in-buffer= completion in the commit a7a984c0ebe.
>> Now your patch works nicely in fido-mode,
>> so I pushed it was well, thanks.
>
> If this is effectively fixing things shouldn't it be in emacs-29?<= br>
I could backport to the emacs-29 branch if Eli agrees.
--00000000000090d36305f5bf13be--