From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 20:20:20 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <875ya1tdwf.fsf@posteo.net> <83edop6sdy.fsf@gnu.org> <831qkp6o0i.fsf@gnu.org> <83wn2h5825.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2gkhzr.fsf@posteo.net> <83cz485oxi.fsf@gnu.org> <87leiwdyff.fsf@posteo.net> <834jpk5hih.fsf@gnu.org> <871qkom3fj.fsf@posteo.net> <83mt3b4yfc.fsf@gnu.org> <87edonlsxi.fsf@posteo.net> <83jzyf4vzb.fsf@gnu.org> <871qknllkj.fsf@posteo.net> <83fs934pjf.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2fk47y.fsf@posteo.net> <83sfd2g2ek.fsf@gnu.org> <875y9yfxrr.fsf@gmail.com> <87y1muefks.fsf@gmail.com> <834jpifizy.fsf@gnu.org> <83y1mue1qi.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38845"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, rpluim@gmail.com, philipk@posteo.net, dmitry@gutov.dev, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, larsi@gnus.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 14 21:19:19 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pnOx5-0009qQ-Lw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 21:19:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnOwu-0000Wb-5S; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 15:19:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnOwp-0000Tv-7M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 15:19:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnOwo-0004F7-Ux for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 15:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnOwn-0007kd-Qp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 15:19:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 19:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.168149991329741 (code B ref 62720); Fri, 14 Apr 2023 19:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Apr 2023 19:18:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47654 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnOwK-0007jd-O4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 15:18:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oa1-f47.google.com ([209.85.160.47]:41885) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnOwI-0007jO-E7 for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 15:18:30 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oa1-f47.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-1878504c22aso9574204fac.8 for <62720@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:18:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1681499904; x=1684091904; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=NBUmg3MLEe6Zxp81PE3SrmwRqSYNZtqcq61mymPkke4=; b=j2uXagWWd6hkqViceyKlV8RTmVgmQnSREy6Z15l2/s2W9yMaquZuNY5CC1uhSPiAX2 DfoCqz6YhZkcv2LQd5zVY6qSJJsErr87Mnr7wsxgjnXquaOsDXeRyAZ0D67jvKMHvzWA RivG39hdYpNb8PBFfAykMD7O9yUrWjG0lA5zTduurBMVP7TwgX8QHS87SgTQGOpamZy/ 3zqAWq2rVr5Rc33QAeMmZuS5zq2njpeaqdh0JPksdIjmM5WEIn4+uvp/X3KBZlscvZNX l6Am79O0tUgwcssTAJPM8pbeIjpD01JIzF5pJKbIjoB1eD2EMbiwrDiG2losm5VMWm// DxKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1681499904; x=1684091904; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NBUmg3MLEe6Zxp81PE3SrmwRqSYNZtqcq61mymPkke4=; b=lz3WyRDlTaCS1zcfoZstD+EF4xhLxjKZvXEqiBm4sx8il5Q85pFaobY8RjfFbjX9cG CfRc5QfWu42f3zQx+al0tpOqFojG+5ounzyT9/d6bnbNsIJcR3rhTufbBgj2f64vLUvv Hv11aOTEHkrFuLC05xA7KdHjb5MY10E1tN3kCaOBzEul1SRzeNz+5f+csO+yBrl0blcT 3lGr64iPL9/hBA14rhZ8mjiSx4OLjYEMD9WPxGgnX5Af8FHXvQ/gABDOkB6sRwVnHu8/ H10w4tSMlrnZztcwktv62FE5Vp2ZGLFC1IPNObnVRnEBrdC4bU50l2+ToYWNCIq4V6eq qWCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9caBR9utBc0NVUFtnnxuIjQdUMb5/dz59i2mDESaBOn5MWbiAC9 16UTQVSiL0+2cp6+MoYCXjw2Rkoa/edwM3rEYJc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZuAaMhAkujy961tSAViu7aF7Do+3kUoujRMuJyWe2IWsod8W70sKu4gRrxgAdtQFRLrZLBmNVEDf+KwNJzsCo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:113:b0:187:9bf2:af63 with SMTP id y19-20020a056871011300b001879bf2af63mr2421647oab.5.1681499904683; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:18:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83y1mue1qi.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259964 Archived-At: On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 7:51=E2=80=AFPM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Why not? > > More generally, why does it make sense not to have in Emacs the latest > stable version of every core package at the time of the release? Well, my answer to that would be: for the same reason it makes sense for like new features not to go into Emacs release branches after they have been cut. The Eglot release 1.14 is not as stable as 1.12.29. It has new features. Also a recent bugfix in commit a74403adda0 is quite complex and I'm cautiously waiting for feedback. Other simple bugfixes have been backported. So I'm not much different than most maintainers in that aspect, I suppose. I also think stock Emacs releases should be very stable, despite what you may think from my stance on this particular matter :-) But if someone types M-x install-something they should get what they ask for. If they want to be 100% safe, they just shouldn't invoke commands that download, compile and evaluate code. Notwithstanding this personal opinion, I underline again that it _is_ possible to craft a simple, emacs-29-safe modification, to the package-install function that is even more cautious to download certain types of things. Jo=C3=A3o