From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2023 19:10:12 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <835ya6onmz.fsf@gnu.org> <87cz4exw9c.fsf@localhost> <877cumxufd.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000342e0f05f8d70e0f" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8279"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Daniel Mendler , Eli Zaretskii , 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 08 20:11:24 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1plD23-00020M-VA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 20:11:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1plD1j-0000X3-HT; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 14:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1plD1i-0000Wt-0Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 14:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1plD1h-000760-P7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 14:11:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1plD1h-0005jh-LG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 14:11:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2023 18:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.168097743221999 (code B ref 62720); Sat, 08 Apr 2023 18:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Apr 2023 18:10:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59493 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1plD1D-0005ij-Li for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 14:10:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ot1-f43.google.com ([209.85.210.43]:39463) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1plD1B-0005iT-SK for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 14:10:30 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ot1-f43.google.com with SMTP id r40-20020a05683044a800b006a14270bc7eso20025169otv.6 for <62720@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 11:10:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680977424; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=B3Ok3S1idphkuhz77K9TVsqU9J+Db1S2eieCuEXp7VI=; b=j6bFgu2hDPhtHbJV/N6s9fUTb9V4QQ4wkExUsxjPZZIctkoGqMFJIokvxSHqSu/C7k v6N2+2a/+d2k7YA+Rr6Q8/eKeGT/Jlck+7HSwsbF9xv7ELb4sgjQHL248DUDLwN3qfsl 2nhKLBopOhD/EYhAnyghCPmwYhjIj/lUZp+oLYp2vnth+84efiXnAGXbYEllOqRAQG1P zHy3E19OvXy0NOXO4SLXeDTPPmZpkhtr2nq7JQc9SSm5mqaF5ox7weJI3eLM071A1r3Y Ww+lFS458tgZ7bKeODDgIOz6O9v8tHFgDQcIaZ0Kd3ZVGd9nMrq56yhW+uxrd/p4/mxS rEeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680977424; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=B3Ok3S1idphkuhz77K9TVsqU9J+Db1S2eieCuEXp7VI=; b=EUaDVdh2uVTvuRHdJbP0KnF1/OZuhGdXGOmnMfanVYb4PXAlqwi920lKNfYpfJAWf+ tC+g22KR2TpHN1RWCtrO+FZj1lDo4PCKn6Y/e5T/qYhhBEp8yfkxb7m80rCmhLIvc6Wa rfT+I5jVB6QMQlihYYmpZ5EUW+Azs4kYPQe4za3BAJdPbM9xUIBXl0r/j4LSfmHKbchI Mx0wQahkQobb+jd5ty+yLAj3CgGyqX1RMNfJilN15GrVrG9JTGZgG0fmbYm+dBLucE2y 14spAOWQuPwgrkp5Uz4xJjC+wjzaitMAEMbMLqXmcGseqSyhRuIVYUheisWNpY/a8v7F cnrQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9cZIgCimjtzfI4p6Pd/+wKhcrThZTHPCfD1cdM5h1J1pxj45hue oPWeJZyp2GNzXgU5s/K/UnIYL+DacvUepIPEstE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350Y0n37qGm9LWHVINMc+d2+LI56TszNRHIf4prc9klg8mH3lBxqBJUEVkvYsQYURjUmDOjTJ6LdoiNrnhbqwCmI= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7495:0:b0:698:6b65:f563 with SMTP id t21-20020a9d7495000000b006986b65f563mr616720otk.4.1680977423509; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 11:10:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877cumxufd.fsf@localhost> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259486 Archived-At: --000000000000342e0f05f8d70e0f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 8, 2023, 16:28 Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora writes: > > >> I think that adding this into compat.el could be also justified. > >> With compat.el being ELPA dependency. > > > > But compat.el is not :core right? So Eglot cannot depend on it. > > Several packages in :core do depend on compat. The idea is to use > (require 'compat nil 'noerror), which does nothing in core, but enables > forward-compatibility features on ELPA. > Sure, that works, your right. And it's a good idea. But it doesn't solve _this_ problem even if compat.el patches package.el, because once you get Emacs 29, you're locked out of ELPA Eglot (unless you take that very circuitous route). > Also I think that's a bit beyond the purpose of compat, though > > I don't oppose it. I really think package.el, like other package > > managers, should learn to update itself. It should be a :core > > ELPA package itself. But then that also requires this bug to > > be fixed. > > I agree that it is slightly out of scope of compat. But this particular > problem appears to be important enough as exception. > Yes, but more importantly, i don't think there's a fix to this bug that can be done fully ELPA-side. Jo=C3=A3o > --000000000000342e0f05f8d70e0f Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Apr 8, 2023, 16:28 Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> wrote:
Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora <joaotavora@gmail.com= > writes:

>> I think that adding this into compat.el could be also justified. >> With compat.el being ELPA dependency.
>
> But compat.el is not :core right?=C2=A0 So Eglot cannot depend on it.<= br>
Several packages in :core do depend on compat. The idea is to use
(require 'compat nil 'noerror), which does nothing in core, but ena= bles
forward-compatibility features on ELPA.

Sure, that works, your right. And it= 's a good idea.=C2=A0

But it doesn't solve _this_ problem even if compat.el patches package= .el, because once you get Emacs 29, you're locked out of ELPA Eglot (un= less you take that very circuitous route).


Yes, but more important= ly, i don't think there's a fix to this bug that can be done fully = ELPA-side.

Jo=C3=A3o
--000000000000342e0f05f8d70e0f--