From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#68246: 30.0.50; Add non-TS mode as extra parent of TS modes Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 15:09:42 +0000 Message-ID: References: <838r53vlo5.fsf@gnu.org> <831qavvcbo.fsf@gnu.org> <83a5phskd5.fsf@gnu.org> <83h6joqz0t.fsf@gnu.org> <834jfoq86m.fsf@gnu.org> <831qarrbjx.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5p84nlh.fsf@gmail.com> <83edekfldq.fsf@gnu.org> <871qajfpr2.fsf@gmail.com> <83cyu2eppn.fsf@gnu.org> <83zfx6d4kt.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27405"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 68246@debbugs.gnu.org, casouri@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 15 16:11:30 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rPOcc-0006wQ-AR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 16:11:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPOcB-00010f-Qa; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:11:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPOcA-00010J-Ij for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPOcA-0001MI-8z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rPOc9-00052L-PU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:11:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 15:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68246 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 68246-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68246.170533140219289 (code B ref 68246); Mon, 15 Jan 2024 15:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 68246) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jan 2024 15:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46694 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rPObC-000512-1E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:10:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::231]:56704) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rPObA-00050Q-0y for 68246@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:10:00 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2cd0d05838fso99634781fa.1 for <68246@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 07:10:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705331394; x=1705936194; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=opErljv9Yjvy8XEoaFITZl6q5khmUWuKe/eubQi2IbQ=; b=Ptyh3yU9r2fXo/E2oQ3XmSyNrZF1HIsCT/BDqC+0zpJd6tJj1V04ZA1C07NpHKkRaU m1rNdzUyC1oplTJBq8BdkZH0YE41OrrfYhGOu3uDm5Oc9tRYBYvv1FXDKcZSjA8yWoMi bD24qWIq0iERoB+dKk2PeOxdvBV/HC5iTk0LOaNJxgYGz0924bm+3FXcF73g58ooPN2h HqG5kqzO7DgaMY15vBa5qfmM8DbQ4R+o5mF7lWAqI4v/6uq22wOaqyy72aHrpAGQ63LD cBjvf/ToP/5WVAWeeG3nQdW+95X3bRBNGbdqvwFKM6lqqXwcJvgaIfD3hr/PyheS5RYT qzVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705331394; x=1705936194; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=opErljv9Yjvy8XEoaFITZl6q5khmUWuKe/eubQi2IbQ=; b=oK7PSZxiaQ0jJapWgl59xM4UXp8CDRDflrIoS3YCtJXNoCEJkwHf0LxoE+e7RRRgTr 3Z9aGMDFcYim2kLHYwtPcnGLyKzbFct8Xte8z9PmFt9GHFzTWKa8iYryVYt1TrRKJ6zx gDXApPQqEICKL2ORwbs2FM2I7W59OVfWuTdc/cuXfjn7Wc2uFbuLUIIrMm4KITC7od81 1OC3cXo5ih25kS4o7BPiAf0fuVGnLfwIeeQgxHGTXHjJpgwez0nyAoGua8uwPcVIWWx9 Le0T3UpdBsfvbs9NaG0q1+4Z7MNb1BxZuxfFMisYq0uwA+5gPd7Pz4z5dZZupM83gp7o 1jvw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzW3KFvDSiVgWyCOvEMGuy4koOrQZtvC4ckZnm9bXK/Snots/xL ffYK7+4MjjdhHwnXiW+4kAodUoMftvi5H0VaS5i0aKn6P0M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE9yWFXnw8NLOF2hs/voBbz+gDE3xXjcX82GzFUNFGYSTzgSYPWsnceRtn5keWduOCpulVWDnC801hv6AgZeB4= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3813:0:b0:2cd:46c1:fd97 with SMTP id f19-20020a2e3813000000b002cd46c1fd97mr2626980lja.36.1705331394058; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 07:09:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83zfx6d4kt.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:278288 Archived-At: On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 3:00=E2=80=AFPM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Thanks, I understood the first time. I just don't agree with your > conclusions. And I already explained why, so at this point let's > agree to disagree, again. There's not much open to interpretation of what "useful" means here. But by all means go ahead and justify what you think these hooks, dir-locals use cases, and other features are "completely useless". You haven't done that. > > There is this crystal clear evidence of usefulness being laid > > in front of you and yet you claim adamantly it is "completely > > useless". With no justification for the statement. Because > > of course, there is no such thing. > Right. The stream of ad-hominem and sarcastic nonsense again. Sorry, > I forgot that I already bowed out of the attempts to discuss this with > you. Mea culpa. That was most obviously not sarcastic. And calling my posts where I give actual evidence of things "nonsense" (which you have done twice now) is, I'm fairly sure, the true ad-hominem here. Unsarcastically yours, Jo=C3=A3o