From: "João Távora" <joaotavora@gmail.com>
To: Felician Nemeth <felician.nemeth@gmail.com>
Cc: 61726@debbugs.gnu.org, Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com>
Subject: bug#61726: [PATCH] Eglot: Support positionEncoding capability
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:11:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALDnm50pwHEuZucCe-VnOy97CD68-8UixHnRbDZvtDQCbzTB=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y1oofh8w.fsf@betli.tmit.bme.hu>
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 5:01 PM Felician Nemeth
<felician.nemeth@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > There is a new LSP capability allowing the server and client to agree on
> > a way to count character offsets. What do you think fo the attached
> > patch?
>
> It closes https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/pull/916, hooray!
I had completely forgotten about your patch! Sorry! Well, re-reading
it, it doesn't seem as complex as Augusto's. Is it also as functional?
Do you want to abandon it in favor of Augusto's?
And can we get a simple performance measurement before&after, maybe
for both patches?
João
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-23 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-23 8:05 bug#61726: [PATCH] Eglot: Support positionEncoding capability Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-23 10:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-23 11:32 ` João Távora
2023-02-23 12:04 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-23 12:24 ` João Távora
2023-02-23 11:46 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-23 12:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-23 13:31 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-23 15:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-23 18:52 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-23 19:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-23 19:28 ` João Távora
2023-02-23 19:52 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 6:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 7:18 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 8:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 9:15 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 10:20 ` João Távora
2023-02-24 11:01 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 11:18 ` João Távora
2023-02-24 11:47 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 12:05 ` João Távora
2023-02-24 12:14 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 11:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 11:55 ` João Távora
2023-02-24 11:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 11:43 ` João Távora
2023-02-24 11:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 12:09 ` João Távora
2023-02-24 12:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 12:31 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 12:01 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 12:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 12:35 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 12:55 ` João Távora
2023-02-24 13:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 13:45 ` João Távora
2023-02-24 13:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 14:45 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 15:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 15:52 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 16:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 16:39 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 17:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 18:08 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 18:55 ` João Távora
2023-02-25 10:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-05 10:26 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-25 10:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-25 11:29 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-25 13:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-25 14:14 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-25 16:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-25 18:10 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-25 22:15 ` João Távora
2023-02-25 22:13 ` João Távora
2023-02-25 22:34 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-25 23:16 ` João Távora
2023-02-25 23:57 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-26 6:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 10:33 ` João Távora
2023-02-26 13:13 ` João Távora
2023-02-26 13:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 13:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 14:17 ` João Távora
2023-02-26 14:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 15:15 ` João Távora
2023-02-26 15:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-27 11:15 ` João Távora
2023-02-26 5:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 10:38 ` João Távora
2023-02-24 14:54 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 15:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 15:56 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 17:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 16:34 ` João Távora
2023-02-24 17:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-23 11:37 ` João Távora
2023-02-23 17:01 ` Felician Nemeth
2023-02-23 17:11 ` João Távora [this message]
2023-02-23 18:42 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-27 10:11 ` Felician Nemeth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALDnm50pwHEuZucCe-VnOy97CD68-8UixHnRbDZvtDQCbzTB=A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=joaotavora@gmail.com \
--cc=61726@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=arstoffel@gmail.com \
--cc=felician.nemeth@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).