unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "João Távora" <joaotavora@gmail.com>
To: Danny Freeman <danny@dfreeman.email>
Cc: 59149@debbugs.gnu.org, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org
Subject: bug#59149: Feature Request: Report progress of long requests in Eglot
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 19:56:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALDnm50Z2_cEmcd31OsB46tNU5sYn=O=drO=Adzg4rEPn4cWXw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wn7l316m.fsf@dfreeman.email>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 980 bytes --]

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 7:45 PM Danny Freeman <danny@dfreeman.email> wrote:
>
>
> Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org> writes:
>
> I am copying him on this email, as I realize he wasn't on this branch of
> the email chain. João, please see the previous emails in the thread for
> more context! Here is a link for convenience:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2022-11/msg01619.html

Yep this is all news to me, but no problem, I just read through the chain.

If, like Stephen says, $progress is part of the base protocol, then there's
no capability associated indeed, but I think we should just make up one
like `:$progress`, and use change eglot--server-capable-p to be able
to respond unequivocally 't' to those special built in capabilities, but
only after checking if they're not in the eglot-ignored-server-capabilities
list.

I think this is more consistent with the other kinds of feature checks we
have elsewhere.

João

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1238 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-23 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-09 14:13 bug#59149: Feature Request: Report progress of long requests in Eglot Danny Freeman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-11-10 15:50 ` João Távora
2022-11-11 13:07   ` Danny Freeman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-11-19  9:42 ` Stephen Leake
2022-11-19 18:03   ` Danny Freeman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-11-21 18:04     ` Stephen Leake
2022-11-23 14:12       ` Danny Freeman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-11-23 18:01         ` Stephen Leake
2022-11-23 19:36           ` Danny Freeman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-11-23 19:56             ` João Távora [this message]
2022-11-24 11:06               ` bug#59149: [SPAM UNSURE] " Stephen Leake
2022-11-24 14:16                 ` João Távora
2022-11-24 21:25                   ` Stephen Leake
2022-11-25 16:11                     ` João Távora
2022-11-25 16:15                     ` Danny Freeman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-11-25 16:31                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-11-25 16:41                         ` Danny Freeman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-11-25 16:44                           ` Danny Freeman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-11-26  1:03                           ` João Távora
2022-11-26 18:37                             ` Danny Freeman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-11-26 19:46                             ` Stefan Kangas
2022-12-01 13:29                               ` Danny Freeman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-12-03 13:23                                 ` João Távora
2022-12-09 13:06                                   ` João Távora
2022-12-09 13:38                                     ` Danny Freeman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-11-22 18:45     ` Stephen Leake

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALDnm50Z2_cEmcd31OsB46tNU5sYn=O=drO=Adzg4rEPn4cWXw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=joaotavora@gmail.com \
    --cc=59149@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=danny@dfreeman.email \
    --cc=stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).