From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28390: Fwd: bug#28390: 26.0.50; overlays-at actually sorts by increating priority Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 20:30:46 +0100 Message-ID: References: <871snijgkk.fsf@lolita> <83tw0dy468.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2vhin47.fsf@lolita> <83lglpy12h.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1147b36251bce40558b29e88" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1504899142 30247 195.159.176.226 (8 Sep 2017 19:32:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 19:32:22 +0000 (UTC) To: 28390@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 08 21:32:18 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dqP0e-0007EG-5P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 21:32:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47057 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dqP0h-0001N9-SC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:32:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43075) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dqP0Y-0001L2-MZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:32:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dqP0U-0002OJ-Nd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47710) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dqP0U-0002Ne-Jm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:32:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dqP0U-0006TE-Ao for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:32:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 19:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28390 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28390-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28390.150489907524814 (code B ref 28390); Fri, 08 Sep 2017 19:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28390) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Sep 2017 19:31:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56391 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dqOzi-0006S9-MS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:31:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qk0-f176.google.com ([209.85.220.176]:36534) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dqOzg-0006Rv-Uc for 28390@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:31:13 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qk0-f176.google.com with SMTP id z143so8665833qkb.3 for <28390@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 12:31:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vj+PI7cJ1P3SWHReNnRFG4fXraDAM/Yr5PNM5gobVjI=; b=Ht1OsUOrMs1k62w5hiZBQTIXNlHGEMEPZ/0O7FJNvBdg2baEB7BW29EmYePwOfGiq7 sNKH1U+EqFLODwX1OVAeoJpXxbHw3ncSOzF570RMcOSMP/R8ho0pPFBvmqUoEtohiMqx VN1Pvh3+QTe8amxpGuLp7wQ0sFiuXeYN3Brys1bSOw9l1I+uJyKlX7S56DPnoYbrUp0Q 3YJ7Xw6KtlWahVVFd4XLcVYxAD+7kqRmceJHRG0rJXTOzbUYvt3Z1dv+sJjNme7Uhj8a obnXhG6v9nxB+hY5XiuDME6no4ghi1+bIUG0+Y9BawFAXztTjaylc1ZmrF938gK7V/zu mTUQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=vj+PI7cJ1P3SWHReNnRFG4fXraDAM/Yr5PNM5gobVjI=; b=rBeUCGfqdg1zV9Ac/jH3ywEAZeYRUC/gvLeA4Hil+jCtjEZcwVd1onWBaPVYKLnjiX UF112ZEPRe4XAtGw50OnfKyBs4rC6hZzrxPvUvkE8+zGNy8tJR7o5gJX/QmGtDSMqe05 Eg2qiod5Cc7+IlRjsnMOO6ig33hR8rtdX1/TlQOHkJgH9pzeqqiX22YtjQwUqWU+NDSK wmeb+IlvbzlRVstPL8YeDQ7dCPTdfQRIIygVXVT8j0KRGNGJVSolVXo9+Am8y6gMvOcs aAUWtqADW8w5ClB2ueS1nD9/ENuE+SQREzVwqsslyITLUz1/cbH47FSxnH5DTY4FJnUv aWpw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhC2hcgn3e0MqG3Uu73kCXieouxkhvTNWgt1m4LcO6g2qymwutK i5KlVIIYXqv7fBurZBOYA0rEYi1TpyHI X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCngVLJQeLu1r9ZnIzgVQp96ZPYDSLe6LLMlJdTwLX8ns2hb+IxeZyUyodx7Cze22vPPpw7FF7ktQoqCPKkilM= X-Received: by 10.55.42.216 with SMTP id q85mr5207921qkq.337.1504899067131; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 12:31:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.12.177.130 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 12:30:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:136688 Archived-At: --001a1147b36251bce40558b29e88 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora Date: Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 7:48 PM Subject: Re: bug#28390: 26.0.50; overlays-at actually sorts by increating priority To: Eli Zaretskii On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > Really? Won't that ripple very paintuflly across the elisp ecosphere? > > I don't think so. I believe this optional argument is used very > rarely. > > > I do agree that it should sort the other way, though. But it's too late > > for that, bugs will be features :-). > > I'm not sure it's too late. You might be right. Even I overestimated how much I use it in my libs. I don't. And the few first pages of a github code search for overlays-at don't disprove you. But they don't prove anything either. Anyway, your call. I wouldn't do it, what's to gain besides consistency? --=20 Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora --001a1147b36251bce40558b29e88 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
---------- Forwarded message --= --------
From: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora <= span dir=3D"ltr"><joaotavora@gma= il.com>
Date: Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: = bug#28390: 26.0.50; overlays-at actually sorts by increating priority
To= : Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>

On Fri, Sep 8= , 2017 at 10:47 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > Really? = Won't that ripple very paintuflly across the elisp ecosphere?
>> I don't think so.=C2=A0 I believe this optional argument is used= very
> rarely.
>
> > I do agr= ee that it should sort the other way, though. But it's too late
>= > for that, bugs will be features :-).
>
> I'm not sure= it's too late.

You might be right. Even I overestimated how much I us= e it in my libs. I don't.=C2=A0

And the few first pages of a github code sear= ch for overlays-at don't disprove=C2=A0
you. But they don't prove anything either.=C2=A0

Anyway, your call. I wouldn= 't do it, what's to gain besides consistency?

--
Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora
--001a1147b36251bce40558b29e88--